Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

GTE

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 136219 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$14,657.70
Client Filers
21
Payments
124
Activity Range
07/27/1999–02/21/2003
Largest Payment
$641.14
Graph: 21 connected filers · 124 payments · $14,657.70 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Howard, Charles F. (The Honorable)$2,652.131306/13/2001
2Burgess, Donnie$1,983.711702/25/2001
3Cain, David H. (The Honorable)$1,749.161008/24/2000
4Madden, Jerry A. (The Honorable)$1,184.94909/09/2000
5Andell, Eric G.$951.56605/28/2000
6Junell, Robert A (The Honorable)$873.441507/26/2000
7David H. Dewhurst Committee$742.39806/04/2001
8Farrar, Jessica$694.09506/12/2000
9Hawley, Judy (The Honorable)$687.991008/13/2000
10Cannon Sheridan, JoAl (Ms.)$641.14103/29/2000
11Grayson County Republican Party$502.62909/08/2000
12Work, Jeff (Mr.)$400.00101/11/2000
13Hopson II, Charles L. (Mr.)$377.71305/16/2000
14Wittig, Don E. (The Honorable)$363.03608/24/2000
15Olivo, Dora (Ms.)$250.00104/01/2000
16Zbranek, Zeb$150.54205/10/2000
17Hochberg, Scott (Mr.)$140.40105/19/2000
18Yarbrough, Kenneth (The Honorable)$100.89108/01/2000
19Flynn, Dan$89.14102/21/2003
20Craddick, Tom$79.53405/08/2000

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
18 85.7% 3,017 0.6%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
15 71.4% 906 1.6%
VERIZON
Vendor ID 343471
13 61.9% 195 6.4%
SOUTHWESTERN BELL
Vendor ID 290073
13 61.9% 238 5.3%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
13 61.9% 677 1.9%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
13 61.9% 1,077 1.2%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
12 57.1% 1,101 1.1%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
12 57.1% 1,327 0.9%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
12 57.1% 1,368 0.9%
VERIZON WIRELESS
Vendor ID 343509
11 52.4% 290 3.7%
TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Vendor ID 312067
11 52.4% 388 2.8%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
11 52.4% 1,360 0.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
02/21/2003Flynn, Dan$89.14campaign phone and fax
06/13/2001Howard, Charles (Mr.)$217.13Telephone Expense
06/04/2001David H. Dewhurst Committee$38.18Telephone expense.
05/04/2001David H. Dewhurst Committee$136.90Telephone expense.
05/04/2001David H. Dewhurst Committee$73.87Telephone expense.
04/23/2001Howard, Charles (Mr.)$19.23Telephone Expense
04/08/2001Howard, Charles (Mr.)$219.68Telephone expense
04/04/2001David H. Dewhurst Committee$89.76Telephone expense.
03/05/2001Howard, Charles (Mr.)$219.24Telephone Expense
03/04/2001David H. Dewhurst Committee$106.33Telephone expense.
03/04/2001David H. Dewhurst Committee$83.01Telephone expense.
02/25/2001Burgess, Donnie$127.48Cell Phone
02/04/2001David H. Dewhurst Committee$88.04Telephone expense.
02/02/2001Howard, Charles (Mr.)$217.19Telephone Expense
01/04/2001Howard, Charles (Mr.)$222.77Telephone expense
12/31/2000Burgess, Don (The Honorable)$135.66Cell Phone
11/15/2000Burgess, Don (The Honorable)$63.91Cell Phone
10/01/2000Burgess, Don (The Honorable)$88.63Cell Phone
09/09/2000Madden, Jerry A. (The Honorable)$131.83phone bill
09/08/2000Grayson County Republican Party$91.76Telephone EXpense
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.