Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
GRAPHICS MANAGEMENT
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 133410 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$7,704,218.01
Client Filers
128
Payments
1,147
Activity Range
01/20/2000–06/16/2026
Largest Payment
$115,434.55
Graph: 128 connected filers · 1,147 payments · $7,704,218.01 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- GRAPHICS MANAGEMENT
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
88 | 68.8% | 3,017 | 2.9% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
75 | 58.6% | 1,571 | 4.6% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
61 | 47.7% | 1,876 | 3.1% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
60 | 46.9% | 1,077 | 5.2% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
59 | 46.1% | 1,536 | 3.7% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
58 | 45.3% | 1,045 | 5.2% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
57 | 44.5% | 1,958 | 2.8% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
56 | 43.8% | 1,174 | 4.5% |
|
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
|
56 | 43.8% | 1,445 | 3.7% |
|
VALENTINE DIRECT MARKETING
Vendor ID 341852
|
55 | 43.0% | 167 | 22.9% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
54 | 42.2% | 1,327 | 3.9% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
53 | 41.4% | 906 | 5.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $1,034.11 | Campaign push cards |
| 05/18/2026 | Middleton II, David M. (The Honorable) | $115,434.55 | campaign advertisement |
| 05/18/2026 | King, Phillip S. (The Honorable) | $2,500.00 | in-kind advertising for Mayes Middleton Campaign |
| 05/15/2026 | Middleton II, David M. (The Honorable) | $45,974.40 | campaign mailer |
| 04/07/2026 | Middleton II, David M. (The Honorable) | $1,230.52 | campaign mailer |
| 04/02/2026 | King, Phillip S. (The Honorable) | $135.31 | campaign advertisement design |
| 02/26/2026 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC | $17,521.41 | In Kind: Campaign Direct Mail |
| 02/21/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $14,870.87 | Campaign mailer |
| 02/17/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $15,902.61 | Campaign mailer |
| 02/17/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $13,830.48 | Campaign mailer |
| 02/11/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $13,370.52 | Campaign mailer |
| 02/11/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $2,644.82 | Campaign door hangers |
| 02/10/2026 | King, Phillip S. (The Honorable) | $4,279.25 | in-kind advertising for Jacob Holt Campaign |
| 02/06/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $13,249.96 | Campaign mailer |
| 02/03/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $13,249.96 | Campaign mailer |
| 02/02/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $1,271.47 | Campaign T-Shirts |
| 01/30/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $13,249.96 | Cost for campaign mailer |
| 01/26/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $13,249.96 | Campaign Mailer |
| 01/26/2026 | Noble, Candace T. (The Honorable) | $2,401.17 | Campaign Sign Toppers and Campaign Push Cards |
| 01/22/2026 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC | $6,527.96 | In Kind: Campaign Direct Mail |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.