Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
FRIENDS OF TONY GARZA
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 122840 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$77,000.00
Client Filers
25
Payments
38
Activity Range
05/27/2000–02/28/2016
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 25 connected filers · 38 payments · $77,000.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Friends of Tony Garza
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
21 | 84.0% | 386 | 5.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
20 | 80.0% | 524 | 3.8% |
|
DAVID DEWHURST COMMITTEE
Vendor ID 85094
|
19 | 76.0% | 236 | 7.9% |
|
TEXANS FOR TOMMY WILLIAMS
Vendor ID 308907
|
18 | 72.0% | 154 | 11.2% |
|
LETICIA VAN DE PUTTE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 190413
|
17 | 68.0% | 202 | 8.1% |
|
JOSE MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169533
|
17 | 68.0% | 222 | 7.4% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
17 | 68.0% | 295 | 5.6% |
|
TEXANS FOR JOE STRAUS
Vendor ID 308707
|
17 | 68.0% | 297 | 5.6% |
|
FRIENDS OF MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Vendor ID 121664
|
16 | 64.0% | 58 | 23.9% |
|
WARREN CHISUM CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 349154
|
16 | 64.0% | 130 | 11.5% |
|
RODNEY ELLIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 267559
|
16 | 64.0% | 187 | 8.2% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
16 | 64.0% | 230 | 6.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.