Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Freeman Decorating Company

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 118671 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$264,921.26
Client Filers
5
Payments
22
Activity Range
06/13/2000–12/28/2012
Largest Payment
$46,000.00
Graph: 5 connected filers · 22 payments · $264,921.26 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Democratic Party (P)$113,216.29609/06/2012
2Texas Democratic Party$74,972.51512/28/2012
3Texas Republican Party$68,692.30406/22/2012
4Republican Party of Texas$4,155.38107/13/2006
5Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$3,884.78603/23/2004

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS WEEKLY
Vendor ID 314586
5 100.0% 89 5.6%
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Vendor ID 157835
5 100.0% 353 1.4%
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
5 100.0% 564 0.9%
WHATABURGER
Vendor ID 352769
5 100.0% 541 0.9%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
5 100.0% 677 0.7%
STARBUCKS
Vendor ID 294631
5 100.0% 690 0.7%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
5 100.0% 1,368 0.4%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
5 100.0% 1,480 0.3%
IPFS Corporation
Vendor ID 158396
4 80.0% 4 80.0%
Knight Office Solutions
Vendor ID 180333
4 80.0% 5 66.7%
AmTrust North America
Vendor ID 16037
4 80.0% 7 50.0%
OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN
Vendor ID 230613
4 80.0% 8 44.4%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/28/2012Texas Democratic Party$5,510.81decorating
11/29/2012Texas Democratic Party$5,000.00decorating
09/06/2012Texas Democratic Party$5,000.00State Convention: venue decorating
06/22/2012Texas Republican Party$44,785.81Party Convention Equipment Rentals
07/22/2008Texas Democratic Party$46,000.00convention set-up and staging
07/22/2008Texas Democratic Party$23,849.85convention set-up and staging
07/15/2008Texas Republican Party$6,022.92Conv Registration Equip Rental
06/25/2008Texas Republican Party$12,158.39Convention Registration Equipment
06/25/2008Texas Republican Party$5,725.18Convention Equipment Rental
07/17/2006Texas Democratic Party$16,762.00convention: set-up and staging
07/13/2006Republican Party of Texas$4,155.38Convention Registration Equipment
06/07/2006Texas Democratic Party$15,247.28convention: setup and staging
12/09/2004Texas Democratic Party$1,492.67convention setup fees
06/15/2004Texas Democratic Party$28,657.81convention setup and decoration
03/23/2004Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$825.13TexMed 2004 Furnighsings carpet cleaning for TEXPAC Booth
03/23/2004Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$825.13TexMed 2004 -- Furnighsings carpet cleaning for TEXPAC Booth
03/23/2004Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$825.13TexMed 2004 Furnighsings carpet cleaning for TEXPAC Booth
03/23/2004Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$825.13TexMed 2004 -- Furnighsings carpet cleaning for TEXPAC Booth
02/21/2003Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$525.42Furnishingsaccessories for TexMed 2003
09/07/2000Texas Democratic Party (P)$16,818.53convention setup staging decorating
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.