Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
FORMA
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 115955 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$133,159.37
Client Filers
4
Payments
27
Activity Range
11/03/2015–01/11/2019
Largest Payment
$20,700.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 27 payments · $133,159.37 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Forma
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $112,659.02 | 19 | 02/21/2018 |
| 2 | Rosales, Yvonne (Ms.) | $12,260.00 | 5 | 01/31/2016 |
| 3 | DeShazo, Hilda Garza (Mrs.) | $6,440.35 | 2 | 01/11/2019 |
| 4 | Quintanilla, Inocente (Mr.) | $1,800.00 | 1 | 03/26/2016 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WHATABURGER
Vendor ID 352769
|
3 | 75.0% | 541 | 0.6% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
3 | 75.0% | 1,876 | 0.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
LOS TRES GALLEGOS
Vendor ID 195748
|
2 | 50.0% | 4 | 33.3% |
|
EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Vendor ID 101349
|
2 | 50.0% | 8 | 20.0% |
|
GO DIRECT MAIL MARKETING
Vendor ID 130327
|
2 | 50.0% | 12 | 14.3% |
|
CARNITAS QUERETARO
Vendor ID 52671
|
2 | 50.0% | 13 | 13.3% |
|
El Paso INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Vendor ID 101551
|
2 | 50.0% | 18 | 10.0% |
|
FLYING J
Vendor ID 115220
|
2 | 50.0% | 59 | 3.3% |
|
EL PASO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 101380
|
2 | 50.0% | 97 | 2.0% |
|
MCDONALDS
Vendor ID 208085
|
2 | 50.0% | 237 | 0.8% |
|
CIRCLE K
Vendor ID 63448
|
2 | 50.0% | 361 | 0.6% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2019 | DeShazo, Hilda Garza (Mrs.) | $1,440.35 | Consulting |
| 10/24/2018 | DeShazo, Hilda Garza (Mrs.) | $5,000.00 | TV Spots |
| 02/21/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $20,700.00 | Mailers #4-#6 |
| 02/21/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $20,160.00 | Media, TV, Radio |
| 02/21/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $2,000.00 | Social Media |
| 02/06/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $6,900.00 | Collateral Material |
| 02/06/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $1,440.00 | Field Canvas/Phone Banking |
| 02/06/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $506.00 | Advocacy |
| 01/25/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $1,598.00 | Field Canvas/Phone Banking |
| 01/10/2018 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $8,000.00 | Political Consulting |
| 12/19/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $13,500.00 | Texas House District 75 - Survey |
| 12/19/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $8,000.00 | Political Consulting |
| 11/14/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $8,000.00 | Political Consulting |
| 11/14/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $677.62 | Collateral Material |
| 11/14/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $481.68 | Collateral Material |
| 11/14/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $450.00 | Social Media |
| 11/14/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $79.93 | Campaign Material |
| 10/26/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $8,000.00 | Political Consulting |
| 10/26/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $5,665.79 | Collateral Material |
| 10/26/2017 | Femath, MarySue Louisa (Mrs.) | $3,500.00 | Voter Data HD 75 |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.