Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

FORD MOTOR CREDIT

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Financial Services
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 115789 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$241,414.33
Client Filers
10
Payments
354
Activity Range
01/26/2000–06/26/2026
Largest Payment
$7,226.12
Graph: 10 connected filers · 354 payments · $241,414.33 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$67,432.818606/26/2026
2Patterson, Jerry E. (Mr.)$56,469.194303/02/2015
3Frullo, John M. (Mr.)$28,936.086702/11/2019
4Turner, Sylvester$24,695.444910/07/2011
5Margo II, Donald R (Mr.)$18,594.122111/26/2012
6Glaze, Bob D$17,428.684004/28/2003
7Farrar, Jessica$11,933.622212/12/2005
8Garza, Timoteo$6,116.931108/04/2004
9Siebert, William E. (The Honorable)$5,442.96911/14/2000
10Anchia, Rafael (Mr.)$4,364.50606/18/2013

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
10 100.0% 3,017 0.3%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
9 90.0% 906 1.0%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
8 80.0% 677 1.2%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
8 80.0% 1,077 0.7%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
8 80.0% 1,368 0.6%
DIAMOND SHAMROCK
Vendor ID 90007
7 70.0% 197 3.5%
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
7 70.0% 355 2.0%
CAPITOL GIFT SHOP
Vendor ID 51371
7 70.0% 393 1.8%
TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Vendor ID 312067
7 70.0% 388 1.8%
TIME WARNER CABLE
Vendor ID 328064
7 70.0% 390 1.8%
CHEVRON
Vendor ID 59468
7 70.0% 596 1.2%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
7 70.0% 1,101 0.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/26/2026King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
05/26/2026King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
04/27/2026King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
03/26/2026King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
02/26/2026King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
01/26/2026King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
12/26/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
11/26/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
10/27/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
09/26/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
08/26/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
07/28/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
06/26/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
05/27/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
04/28/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
03/26/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
02/26/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
01/27/2025King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
12/26/2024King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
11/26/2024King, Phillip S. (The Honorable)$922.32campaign vehicle lease payment
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.