Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Flywire Global
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 115301 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$81,851.58
Client Filers
4
Payments
27
Activity Range
08/04/2025–06/02/2026
Largest Payment
$25,973.37
Graph: 4 connected filers · 27 payments · $81,851.58 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Flywire Global
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rehmet, Taylor (The Honorable) | $79,113.22 | 17 | 06/02/2026 |
| 2 | Travis County Democratic Party | $1,150.40 | 7 | 01/06/2026 |
| 3 | Reyna II, Daniel Joshua (Mr.) | $1,147.35 | 2 | 02/03/2026 |
| 4 | Brown, Jordan W. (Mr.) | $440.61 | 1 | 02/03/2026 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAMPAIGN VERIFY
Vendor ID 50013
|
4 | 100.0% | 216 | 1.9% |
|
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
|
4 | 100.0% | 592 | 0.7% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
4 | 100.0% | 1,669 | 0.2% |
|
Blue Victory Communications
Vendor ID 37337
|
3 | 75.0% | 25 | 11.5% |
|
GUSTO
Vendor ID 137115
|
3 | 75.0% | 49 | 6.0% |
|
HARLAND CLARKE
Vendor ID 139665
|
3 | 75.0% | 670 | 0.4% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
PRINTMAILPRO
Vendor ID 250313
|
2 | 50.0% | 16 | 11.1% |
|
CCR Studios
Vendor ID 55360
|
2 | 50.0% | 23 | 8.0% |
|
JERSEY MIKES
Vendor ID 164547
|
2 | 50.0% | 26 | 7.1% |
|
Easy Tiger
Vendor ID 98364
|
2 | 50.0% | 28 | 6.7% |
|
ALOFT AUSTIN
Vendor ID 12358
|
2 | 50.0% | 31 | 6.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2026 | Rehmet, Taylor (The Honorable) | $1,418.42 | Texting Platform (Scale to Win) |
| 05/04/2026 | Rehmet, Taylor (The Honorable) | $36.61 | Texting Platform (Scale to Win) |
| 04/02/2026 | Rehmet, Taylor (The Honorable) | $98.10 | Texting Platform (Scale to Win) |
| 04/02/2026 | Brown, Jordan W. (Mr.) | $61.24 | texting service |
| 03/05/2026 | Brown, Jordan W. (Mr.) | $798.61 | Text services |
| 03/03/2026 | Rehmet, Taylor (The Honorable) | $153.11 | Texting Platform (Scale to Win) |
| 02/25/2026 | Brown, Jordan W. (Mr.) | $2,103.75 | Text outreach |
| 02/03/2026 | Rehmet, Taylor (The Honorable) | $25,973.37 | Texting Platform (Scale to Win) |
| 02/03/2026 | Reyna II, Daniel Joshua (Mr.) | $1,040.13 | Scale to Win Texting Service |
| 02/03/2026 | Brown, Jordan W. (Mr.) | $440.61 | Texting platform |
| 01/06/2026 | Travis County Democratic Party | $113.16 | Work Flow |
| 01/06/2026 | Reyna II, Daniel Joshua (Mr.) | $107.22 | wire transfer fee |
| 12/16/2025 | Rehmet, Taylor (Mr.) | $102.82 | Consultant |
| 12/02/2025 | Rehmet, Taylor (Mr.) | $3,921.07 | Consultant |
| 12/02/2025 | Travis County Democratic Party | $12.38 | Work Flow |
| 11/06/2025 | Rehmet, Taylor (Mr.) | $3,967.92 | Consultant |
| 11/06/2025 | Travis County Democratic Party | $579.67 | Work Flow |
| 11/05/2025 | Rehmet, Taylor (Mr.) | $4,192.53 | Consultant |
| 10/30/2025 | Rehmet, Taylor (Mr.) | $2,633.77 | Consultant |
| 10/28/2025 | Rehmet, Taylor (Mr.) | $5,108.56 | Consultant |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.