Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Farrell Gjesdal
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 110652 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$163,158.79
Client Filers
4
Payments
23
Activity Range
01/02/2020–03/24/2026
Largest Payment
$35,287.00
Graph: 4 connected filers · 23 payments · $163,158.79 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Farrell Gjesdal
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $147,276.09 | 10 | 03/24/2026 |
| 2 | Brazos Values | $10,219.15 | 6 | 03/07/2025 |
| 3 | Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC) | $4,500.00 | 6 | 06/02/2020 |
| 4 | Hilburn, David G. (Mr.) | $1,163.55 | 1 | 12/31/2021 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 29722
|
2 | 50.0% | 14 | 12.5% |
|
FARRELL GJESDAL STRATEGY GROUP
Vendor ID 110653
|
2 | 50.0% | 21 | 8.7% |
|
ANEDOT INC.
Vendor ID 16993
|
2 | 50.0% | 168 | 1.2% |
|
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
|
2 | 50.0% | 642 | 0.3% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
2 | 50.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2026 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $13,808.08 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 02/27/2026 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $6,900.00 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 02/25/2026 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $10,000.00 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 02/10/2026 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $13,279.60 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 12/31/2025 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $3,155.65 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 11/17/2025 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $18,546.66 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 09/28/2025 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $8,410.50 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 07/19/2025 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $5,060.00 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 02/21/2024 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $32,828.60 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 02/02/2024 | Kitzman Jr., Oliver S. (The Honorable) | $35,287.00 | Campaign Consulting, Social Media Management |
| 12/31/2021 | Hilburn, David G. (Mr.) | $1,163.55 | consultant, website |
| 12/07/2021 | Brazos Values | $437.80 | Voter Interest |
| 11/05/2021 | Brazos Values | $2,117.99 | Voter Interest |
| 10/22/2021 | Brazos Values | $6,016.90 | Media |
| 06/02/2020 | Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC) | $750.00 | Consulting, Marketing, CRM |
| 05/04/2020 | Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC) | $750.00 | Consulting, Marketing, CRM |
| 04/02/2020 | Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC) | $750.00 | Consulting, Marketing, CRM |
| 03/02/2020 | Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC) | $750.00 | Consulting, Marketing, CRM |
| 02/03/2020 | Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC) | $750.00 | Consulting, Marketing, CRM |
| 01/02/2020 | Republican Party of Brazos County (CEC) | $750.00 | Consulting, Marketing, CRM |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.