Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

FACEBOOK ADVERTISING

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Campaign Technology Data
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 109254 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$180,577.87
Client Filers
34
Payments
644
Activity Range
05/25/2009–03/23/2026
Largest Payment
$5,918.20
Graph: 34 connected filers · 644 payments · $180,577.87 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Right To Life PAC$116,019.2922410/14/2020
2Texans for Rick Perry$13,999.282106/30/2014
3David Dewhurst Committee$9,633.7814401/25/2010
4Estes, Craig (The Honorable)$7,634.173408/31/2018
5Dallas County Republican Party (CEC)$6,116.971012/02/2020
6Northern Cameron County Democrats$5,379.581404/24/2025
7Dokupil, Susanna (Ms.)$4,514.702612/05/2024
8Kebodeaux Cook, Emily (Mrs.)$3,040.52603/13/2018
9Fergus, Mary Ann (Ms.)$2,273.45403/28/2014
10Austin Young Democrats$1,969.281603/23/2026
11Democratic Club of The Woodlands$1,917.091506/14/2020
12Northcutt, Ralph (Mr.)$1,486.45611/07/2012
13Pflugerville Area Democrats$782.25305/18/2025
14Davila, Michelle Arevalo (Mrs.)$750.00303/06/2018
15Branch, Dan$714.98312/31/2014
16Lake Travis Fire Fighters PAC$700.00402/22/2020
17LCISD - Build the Future$562.511805/24/2021
18Tidwell, Ronald W. (The Honorable)$491.61403/31/2016
19Drago, Joseph A. (Mr.)$344.751507/09/2020
20Farrar, Jessica (The Honorable)$308.841008/30/2017

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
20 58.8% 3,017 0.7%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
18 52.9% 1,958 0.9%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
15 44.1% 1,571 0.9%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
15 44.1% 1,876 0.8%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
14 41.2% 1,101 1.2%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
13 38.2% 1,480 0.9%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
13 38.2% 1,536 0.8%
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
12 35.3% 947 1.2%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
12 35.3% 1,638 0.7%
LOWE'S
Vendor ID 196502
11 32.4% 734 1.5%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
11 32.4% 1,360 0.8%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
11 32.4% 1,368 0.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/23/2026Austin Young Democrats$84.29Facebook Advertising
02/26/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
02/25/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
02/24/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
02/23/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
02/23/2026Austin Young Democrats$52.79Facebook Advertising
02/21/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
02/20/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
02/19/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
02/18/2026Austin Young Democrats$179.00Facebook Advertising
09/23/2025Austin Young Democrats$5.45Advertising Cost
09/23/2025Austin Young Democrats$5.45Advertising Cost
08/30/2025Austin Young Democrats$170.00Ads
08/30/2025Austin Young Democrats$170.00Ads
08/24/2025Austin Young Democrats$24.65Ads
08/24/2025Austin Young Democrats$24.65Ads
05/18/2025Pflugerville Area Democrats$381.07Meta platform digital ads
04/24/2025Northern Cameron County Democrats$138.61online adv
04/18/2025Pflugerville Area Democrats$383.95Meta platform digital ads
04/18/2025Pflugerville Area Democrats$17.23Meta platform digital ads
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.