Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Exclusive Decals & Screenprinting

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 107467 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$11,409.45
Client Filers
2
Payments
6
Activity Range
03/11/2014–09/04/2015
Largest Payment
$3,574.95
Graph: 2 connected filers · 6 payments · $11,409.45 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Community United$11,251.95509/25/2014
2West Hidalgo County SD 20 Tejano Democrats$157.50109/04/2015

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
2 100.0% 1,480 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
09/04/2015West Hidalgo County SD 20 Tejano Democrats$157.50Down payment (50%) on WHCSD20TD shirts
09/25/2014Community United$3,574.95Printing of campaign signs, bumper stickers, tri-fold brochures for candidates supported by CU
03/23/2014Community United$1,924.25Printing of Political Signs and Wire Frames
03/11/2014Community United$1,914.25Printing of Political Signs and Frames
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.