Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Escalante's
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 106183 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$10,287.86
Client Filers
22
Payments
38
Activity Range
09/25/2000–02/26/2024
Largest Payment
$1,528.99
Graph: 22 connected filers · 38 payments · $10,287.86 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Escalante's
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
15 | 68.2% | 3,017 | 0.5% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
12 | 54.5% | 1,077 | 1.1% |
|
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
|
11 | 50.0% | 898 | 1.2% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
11 | 50.0% | 1,101 | 1.0% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
11 | 50.0% | 1,327 | 0.8% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
11 | 50.0% | 1,480 | 0.7% |
|
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
|
10 | 45.5% | 947 | 1.0% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
10 | 45.5% | 1,174 | 0.8% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
10 | 45.5% | 1,368 | 0.7% |
|
HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 140510
|
9 | 40.9% | 457 | 1.9% |
|
SHELL
Vendor ID 281652
|
9 | 40.9% | 614 | 1.4% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
9 | 40.9% | 906 | 1.0% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/26/2024 | Zimmerer, Gerald L. (The Honorable) | $383.93 | Officeholder expense - prorata share of holiday lunch with office staff |
| 01/02/2023 | Zimmerer, Gerald L. (The Honorable) | $325.41 | Officeholder expense - food for annual joint 1st and 14th Court of Appeals holiday party |
| 09/01/2020 | Republican Notional Hispanic Assembly - Texas Chapter | $743.61 | Volunteer appreciation dinner |
| 12/05/2019 | Republican Party of Fort Bend County (CEC) | $52.77 | Lunch Meeting |
| 10/28/2019 | Chan, Leonard N. (Mr.) | $190.00 | Food |
| 04/24/2019 | Spain Jr., Charles A. (The Honorable) | $83.02 | Administrative Assistants luncheon |
| 10/16/2018 | Hart, Bradley S. (The Honorable) | $12.72 | food during review of digital ad and print ad |
| 07/19/2017 | Delgado, Rodolfo (The Honorable) | $44.00 | Officeholder lunch with contributor planning fundraising event in Houston for 13th Court of Appeals |
| 10/08/2014 | Houston, Samuel A. (Mr.) | $206.57 | Meeting wtih social media team |
| 10/21/2013 | Torres, Raul (Mr.) | $32.15 | Meal while traveling for campaign |
| 10/03/2013 | Farr, David | $1,350.00 | Food or fundraising event |
| 10/25/2011 | Bond, Stacey W. (Mrs.) | $66.69 | Dinner for volunteers at judicial campaign signing party. |
| 07/12/2011 | Friends of Judge Ken Wise | $38.32 | officeholder dinner meeting with contributor/supporter |
| 10/11/2010 | David Dewhurst Committee | $77.97 | Campaign staff travel meal |
| 10/11/2010 | David Dewhurst Committee | $77.97 | Campaign staff travel meal |
| 09/23/2010 | Farr, David | $35.72 | Lunch meeting with Campaign Consultant |
| 09/21/2010 | Farr, David | $1,259.85 | Food for Fundraising Event |
| 03/25/2010 | Committee to Elect Patrick Rose | $84.93 | Dinner Meeting |
| 02/12/2009 | Houston Apartment Association Better Government Fund | $1,298.21 | Luncheon for BGF Members |
| 11/17/2008 | David Dewhurst Committee | $31.17 | Travel meal |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.