Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Enlace Newspaper
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 104861 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$1,550.00
Client Filers
2
Payments
2
Activity Range
09/24/2012–12/03/2015
Largest Payment
$1,400.00
Graph: 2 connected filers · 2 payments · $1,550.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Enlace Newspaper
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alvarez, J.M. (Mr.) | $1,400.00 | 1 | 12/03/2015 |
| 2 | Garza, Ana Lisa (The Honorable) | $150.00 | 1 | 09/24/2012 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HEBBRONVILLE VIEW
Vendor ID 143214
|
2 | 100.0% | 9 | 22.2% |
|
STARR COUNTY TOWN CRIER
Vendor ID 295047
|
2 | 100.0% | 11 | 18.2% |
|
SIGN WORKS
Vendor ID 284369
|
2 | 100.0% | 17 | 11.8% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,669 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2015 | Alvarez, J.M. (Mr.) | $1,400.00 | newspaper ad |
| 09/24/2012 | Garza, Ana Lisa (The Honorable) | $150.00 | advertisement for supporting local sports |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.