Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Emory & Young
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 104431 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$422,725.65
Client Filers
8
Payments
57
Activity Range
04/10/2000–11/21/2006
Largest Payment
$102,504.26
Graph: 8 connected filers · 57 payments · $422,725.65 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Emory & Young
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parsons III, James N. (Judge) | $222,942.17 | 12 | 12/12/2002 |
| 2 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $86,937.49 | 14 | 11/21/2006 |
| 3 | Venso, Norma (Judge) | $46,611.99 | 5 | 10/22/2004 |
| 4 | Luna, Vilma | $38,934.00 | 17 | 05/22/2006 |
| 5 | Soechting, Charles (Mr.) | $17,000.00 | 6 | 11/22/2005 |
| 6 | Alvarado Jr., Leo | $7,900.00 | 1 | 04/10/2000 |
| 7 | Good Government Fund | $1,200.00 | 1 | 06/02/2000 |
| 8 | PSEL PAC | $1,200.00 | 1 | 06/02/2000 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,360 | 0.3% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,669 | 0.2% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
3 | 37.5% | 253 | 1.2% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
3 | 37.5% | 1,368 | 0.2% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 37.5% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
Anne Darr Campaign
Vendor ID 17886
|
2 | 25.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
|
Anne Gardner Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 17892
|
2 | 25.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
|
Bonnie Sudderth Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 38875
|
2 | 25.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
|
Bryan Hughes Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 44067
|
2 | 25.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
|
Carole Keeton Strayhorn Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 52831
|
2 | 25.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
|
Chris Paddie Campaign Committee
Vendor ID 61833
|
2 | 25.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
|
Dale Wainwright Campaign Commitee
Vendor ID 82202
|
2 | 25.0% | 2 | 25.0% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/21/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $675.00 | ads |
| 10/20/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $3,529.00 | phone bank |
| 10/05/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $15,386.00 | mailer |
| 10/05/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $14,104.00 | phone bank |
| 10/03/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $2,500.00 | fee |
| 09/27/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $5,000.00 | fee |
| 09/27/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $241.13 | email ad |
| 09/10/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $11,600.00 | mailer |
| 08/31/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $5,000.00 | fee |
| 08/21/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $10,902.36 | mailer |
| 08/14/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $5,000.00 | fee |
| 07/25/2006 | Criss, Susan (Ms.) | $5,000.00 | fee |
| 06/23/2006 | Criss, Susan | $5,500.00 | consulting |
| 06/23/2006 | Criss, Susan | $2,500.00 | consulting |
| 05/22/2006 | Luna, Vilma | $600.00 | consulting services |
| 11/22/2005 | Soechting, Charles (Mr.) | $2,000.00 | Consultation |
| 10/10/2005 | Soechting, Charles (Mr.) | $1,000.00 | Consultation |
| 05/09/2005 | Soechting, Charles (Mr.) | $2,000.00 | state conv. reimbursement |
| 05/09/2005 | Soechting, Charles (Mr.) | $2,000.00 | state conv. reimbursement |
| 03/09/2005 | Luna, Vilma | $1,000.00 | consulting services |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.