Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Ellen Troxclair for Texas
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 103548 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$282,500.00
Client Filers
41
Payments
70
Activity Range
06/28/2021–06/17/2026
Largest Payment
$60,000.00
Graph: 41 connected filers · 70 payments · $282,500.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Ellen Troxclair for Texas
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
32 | 78.0% | 239 | 12.9% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
29 | 70.7% | 524 | 5.4% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
28 | 68.3% | 295 | 9.1% |
|
TEXANS FOR TRENT ASHBY
Vendor ID 308916
|
27 | 65.9% | 190 | 13.2% |
|
JEFF LEACH CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 163617
|
27 | 65.9% | 198 | 12.7% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
27 | 65.9% | 325 | 8.0% |
|
FRIENDS OF BRANDON CREIGHTON
Vendor ID 119895
|
26 | 63.4% | 229 | 10.7% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
26 | 63.4% | 273 | 9.0% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
26 | 63.4% | 289 | 8.6% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
26 | 63.4% | 325 | 7.6% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
26 | 63.4% | 359 | 7.0% |
|
TEXANS FOR KELLY HANCOCK
Vendor ID 308753
|
25 | 61.0% | 236 | 9.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.