Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
EHLJ, LLC
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 100287 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$13,628.06
Client Filers
2
Payments
2
Activity Range
05/02/2025–08/18/2025
Largest Payment
$13,373.20
Graph: 2 connected filers · 2 payments · $13,628.06 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- EHLJ, LLC
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garza Jr., Noe D. (Mr.) | $13,373.20 | 1 | 08/18/2025 |
| 2 | Cameron County Republican Party | $254.86 | 1 | 05/02/2025 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DOLLAR TREE
Vendor ID 92561
|
2 | 100.0% | 578 | 0.3% |
|
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,174 | 0.2% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,045 | 0.2% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,480 | 0.1% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
2 | 100.0% | 1,876 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2025 | Garza Jr., Noe D. (Mr.) | $13,373.20 | SIGNS |
| 05/02/2025 | Cameron County Republican Party | $254.86 | Yard Signs Production for Opposition to Ballot Measure |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.