Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
DREW SPRINGER FOR TEXAS
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 95643 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$473,376.32
Client Filers
86
Payments
196
Activity Range
06/28/2012–10/27/2023
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 86 connected filers · 196 payments · $473,376.32 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Drew Springer for Texas
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
72 | 83.7% | 524 | 13.4% |
|
TEXANS FOR DAN PATRICK
Vendor ID 308568
|
70 | 81.4% | 359 | 18.7% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
64 | 74.4% | 289 | 20.6% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
64 | 74.4% | 295 | 20.2% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
64 | 74.4% | 325 | 18.4% |
|
FRIENDS OF BRANDON CREIGHTON
Vendor ID 119895
|
63 | 73.3% | 229 | 25.0% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
63 | 73.3% | 325 | 18.1% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
62 | 72.1% | 273 | 20.9% |
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
61 | 70.9% | 239 | 23.1% |
|
TEXANS FOR CHRIS PADDIE
Vendor ID 308536
|
59 | 68.6% | 180 | 28.5% |
|
TEXANS FOR TRENT ASHBY
Vendor ID 308916
|
58 | 67.4% | 190 | 26.6% |
|
CRAIG GOLDMAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 78125
|
58 | 67.4% | 198 | 25.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2023 | NRG Energy Inc. Political Action Committee | $4,000.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
| 10/10/2023 | Political Action Committee of Winstead PC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contributions |
| 08/24/2023 | BNSF Railway Company RAILPAC | $2,500.00 | To Support Primary 2024 State Senate 30 TX |
| 08/24/2023 | Coats Rose PAC | $2,000.00 | Contribution from PAC |
| 08/24/2023 | Union Pacific Corp. Fund For Effective Government | $1,500.00 | To Support Primary 2024 State Senate 30 TX |
| 07/27/2023 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 07/24/2023 | Coats Rose PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution to campaign made by PAC |
| 06/30/2023 | Family Empowerment Coalition PAC | $10,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/13/2022 | TX Diamondback Energy, Inc. Political Action Committee | $3,000.00 | campaign contribution |
| 12/07/2022 | NuStarpac | $1,000.00 | NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 12/06/2022 | Coats Rose PAC | $7,500.00 | Campaign contribution from PAC |
| 12/06/2022 | Friends of TWU PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/01/2022 | Texas Land Title Association PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/29/2022 | Health Care Service Corporation Political Action Committee - Texas | $1,000.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
| 11/17/2022 | Texas Pharmacy Association PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/15/2022 | Texas Impact, a CRH PAC | $2,000.00 | 2022 contribution |
| 11/14/2022 | Texas Farm Bureau AGFUND | $2,500.00 | CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/14/2022 | Hochheim Prairie Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Donation |
| 11/10/2022 | Incline P&C Group PAC | $2,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 11/03/2022 | Cypress Solar TX PAC | $1,000.00 | Monetary Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.