Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Financial Services
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 87576 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$99,476.75
Client Filers
24
Payments
479
Activity Range
05/14/2001–12/16/2015
Largest Payment
$4,273.15
Graph: 24 connected filers · 479 payments · $99,476.75 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Democratic Party$21,106.0722812/07/2011
2Texas Democratic Party$15,047.9615604/03/2013
3White, Kelly (Ms.)$10,911.99904/21/2004
4Friends of Judge Anne Ashby$9,690.08306/07/2007
5Texans for Rick Perry$8,282.35811/29/2006
6Dallas Black Firefighters Political Action Committee$6,269.881008/19/2009
7Akins, Marty (Mr.)$5,426.341810/15/2002
8Specia Jr., John$3,470.31303/04/2008
9Burnam, Lon$2,315.33112/31/2002
10Friends of Dan Mills$2,194.06112/16/2015
11Texas Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors Political Action Committee$2,180.99103/01/2005
12Sakai, Peter (Mr.)$2,092.51207/30/2006
13Brown, Betty$1,739.66102/21/2008
14Friends of Roy Blake Jr.$1,620.67207/22/2004
15Tison, Joe (Mr.)$1,346.65102/21/2008
16Martinez Fischer, Trey (Mr.)$1,208.44102/27/2003
17Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$1,203.541503/06/2007
18Texans for Don Willett$882.21101/25/2006
19Tarrant County Republican Party$562.56208/05/2004
20Rodriguez, Eduardo$538.321206/04/2003

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
17 70.8% 3,017 0.6%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
15 62.5% 906 1.6%
SBC
Vendor ID 276810
14 58.3% 321 4.2%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
14 58.3% 1,327 1.0%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
14 58.3% 1,368 1.0%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
13 54.2% 1,101 1.2%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
13 54.2% 1,360 0.9%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
13 54.2% 1,536 0.8%
AMAZON.COM
Vendor ID 13762
12 50.0% 553 2.1%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
12 50.0% 1,077 1.1%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
12 50.0% 1,958 0.6%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
11 45.8% 677 1.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/16/2015Friends of Dan Mills$2,194.06Laptop computer
04/03/2013Texas Democratic Party$2,335.17Office Computer Hardware
04/03/2013Texas Democratic Party$800.42Office computer hardware
12/07/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
12/07/2011Texas Democratic Party$28.62network hardware
11/30/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
11/30/2011Texas Democratic Party$28.62network hardware
09/02/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
09/02/2011Texas Democratic Party$28.62network hardware
07/15/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
07/15/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
06/16/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
06/16/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
05/11/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
05/11/2011Texas Democratic Party$34.99network hardware
10/06/2010Texas Democratic Party$28.62network hardware
10/06/2010Texas Democratic Party$28.62network hardware
08/31/2010Texas Democratic Party$200.55financial service fees
08/31/2010Texas Democratic Party$200.55financial service fees
08/31/2010Texas Democratic Party$156.88financial service fees
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.