Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
DAN ELLIS CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 83564 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$148,113.09
Client Filers
60
Payments
156
Activity Range
06/15/2000–11/15/2004
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 60 connected filers · 156 payments · $148,113.09 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Dan Ellis Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHUCK HOPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 62632
|
46 | 76.7% | 172 | 24.7% |
|
ROBBY COOK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 265980
|
43 | 71.7% | 101 | 36.4% |
|
ALLAN RITTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 11452
|
42 | 70.0% | 135 | 27.5% |
|
JIM MCREYNOLDS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165432
|
41 | 68.3% | 116 | 30.4% |
|
MARK HOMER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 203518
|
41 | 68.3% | 132 | 27.2% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
41 | 68.3% | 325 | 11.9% |
|
MIKE JACKSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 213615
|
40 | 66.7% | 162 | 22.0% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
40 | 66.7% | 227 | 16.2% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
40 | 66.7% | 268 | 13.9% |
|
PETE GALLEGO CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 242611
|
39 | 65.0% | 148 | 23.1% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
39 | 65.0% | 187 | 18.8% |
|
JOHN CARONA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167515
|
38 | 63.3% | 213 | 16.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2004 | Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee | $79.51 | In-kind contribution - printing/mailing support letter for Dan Ellis |
| 11/15/2004 | TXPAC | $79.51 | Texas Medical Association |
| 11/15/2004 | TXPAC | $79.51 | Texas Medical Association |
| 10/21/2004 | Texas Future Fund | $400.00 | Sponsorship |
| 10/20/2004 | SBC Texas Employee PAC | $1,000.00 | Dan Ellis STATE HOUSE 18th TX |
| 10/19/2004 | Texas 2020 PAC | $10,000.00 | political contribution |
| 10/19/2004 | Texas Alliance of Recreational Organizations Inc. PAC | $250.00 | Political contribution to support Democratic candidate for State Representative District 18. |
| 10/14/2004 | Raymond, Richard | $1,000.00 | contribution |
| 10/14/2004 | Committee for Responsible Government of Temple-Inland Inc. | $500.00 | Contribution--House District 18 |
| 10/13/2004 | Texas Land Title Association PAC | $250.00 | contribution |
| 10/12/2004 | Texas Wildlife Association PAC | $250.00 | Political Contribution |
| 10/11/2004 | Texas Federation of Teachers Committee on Political Education | $1,000.00 | Officeholder/campaign support |
| 10/08/2004 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC | $2,500.00 | campaign contribution - HD 18 (D) |
| 10/07/2004 | Coleman, Garnet (Mr.) | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/05/2004 | Texas 2020 PAC | $10,000.00 | political contribution |
| 10/05/2004 | Geren, Charlie | $1,000.00 | Contribution |
| 10/01/2004 | Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC | $5,000.00 | campaign contribution - HD 18 (D) |
| 09/30/2004 | SBC Texas Employee PAC | $100.00 | Dan Ellis STATE HOUSE 18th TX |
| 09/29/2004 | One Call Concepts PAC | $250.00 | |
| 09/28/2004 | Vinson Elkins Texas Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Contribution to State Representative Dan Ellis TX18D General 2004 |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.