Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
DAN BRANCH CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 83519 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$608,000.00
Client Filers
84
Payments
239
Activity Range
01/25/2002–05/31/2016
Largest Payment
$50,000.00
Graph: 84 connected filers · 239 payments · $608,000.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Dan Branch Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JIM PITTS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165491
|
68 | 81.0% | 189 | 33.2% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
64 | 76.2% | 325 | 18.6% |
|
DENNIS BONNEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 88445
|
60 | 71.4% | 227 | 23.9% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
60 | 71.4% | 524 | 10.9% |
|
JOHN CARONA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 167515
|
59 | 70.2% | 213 | 24.8% |
|
TEXANS FOR RICK PERRY
Vendor ID 308841
|
59 | 70.2% | 386 | 14.4% |
|
BYRON COOK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 46692
|
58 | 69.0% | 165 | 30.4% |
|
CRAIG ESTES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 78091
|
56 | 66.7% | 163 | 29.3% |
|
TOM CRADDICK CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329477
|
56 | 66.7% | 230 | 21.7% |
|
MYRA CROWNOVER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 220752
|
55 | 65.5% | 151 | 30.6% |
|
JIM KEFFER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 165367
|
55 | 65.5% | 187 | 25.5% |
|
ROYCE WEST CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 270038
|
55 | 65.5% | 199 | 24.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2016 | Texans for Dan Branch | $30,000.00 | Contribution |
| 02/27/2015 | Texans for Dan Branch | $10,000.00 | campaign contribution to officeholder account |
| 01/12/2015 | Texans for Dan Branch | $17,500.00 | campaign contribution to officeholder account |
| 01/12/2015 | Texans for Dan Branch | $15,000.00 | campaign contribution to officeholder account |
| 11/04/2014 | Texans for Dan Branch | $35,000.00 | Campaign Contribution to Officeholder Account |
| 06/25/2014 | Texans for Dan Branch | $40,000.00 | Campaign Contribution to Officeholder Account |
| 06/23/2014 | Texans for Dan Branch | $45,000.00 | Campaign Contribution to Officeholder Account |
| 05/21/2014 | Baker Botts Amicus Fund | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 04/30/2014 | Woolley, Beverly (Mrs.) | $5,000.00 | campaign contribution |
| 04/10/2014 | The Real Estate Council Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 03/26/2014 | Q PAC | $10,000.00 | 2014 Political Contribution |
| 02/21/2014 | Balance PAC | $12,500.00 | Share of media consulting expenses |
| 02/19/2014 | Q PAC | $1,000.00 | 2014 Political Contribution |
| 01/24/2014 | K&L Gates LLP Committee for Good Government | $4,000.00 | Campaign contribution to support candidate. |
| 01/24/2014 | K&L Gates LLP Committee for Good Government | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution to support candidate. |
| 01/14/2014 | Baker Botts Amicus Fund | $1,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 11/04/2013 | Texas Apartment Association PAC | $12,500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 10/09/2013 | BNSF Railway Company RAILPAC (BNSF RAILPAC) | $1,500.00 | To Support Primary 2014 State Att. General TX |
| 10/07/2013 | Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP Campaign Fund | $1,000.00 | Support re-election to Texas Attorney General |
| 10/01/2013 | AT&T Texas PAC | $10,000.00 | Dan Branch STATE HOUSE 108th TX |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.