Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

DALLAS COUNTY ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 82645 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$3,758.96
Client Filers
18
Payments
33
Activity Range
07/22/2002–10/07/2025
Largest Payment
$686.00
Graph: 18 connected filers · 33 payments · $3,758.96 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Dallas County Democratic Party$899.59307/01/2024
2Alonzo, Roberto R. (The Honorable)$551.41303/16/2016
3Williams, Staci (The Honorable)$389.58306/15/2018
4Neave, Victoria (The Honorable)$252.73310/12/2022
5Dallas County Republican Party (P)$235.05104/18/2019
6Keffer, William R. (Mr.)$225.19604/11/2008
7Vote NO RISD TRE$221.37110/05/2018
8Lord, Justin (Mr.)$149.33110/21/2013
9Bennett, Jennifer (Ms.)$149.25110/14/2013
10Mays, Lela D. (Ms.)$138.87211/08/2017
11Jones Jr., Venton C. (Mr.)$121.00108/08/2022
12GREEN, BRENDA GARRETT$120.00112/20/2005
13Boos, Jonathan M. (Mr.)$113.20110/17/2018
14Hernandez, Cassandra (Mrs.)$78.50109/12/2023
15Irving Issues$40.24203/01/2013
16Anyiam, Chika A. (Mrs.)$31.83103/23/2016
17Herbert, Zachary D. (Mr.)$31.67110/07/2025
18Kids First$10.15111/25/2013

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
14 77.8% 3,017 0.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
12 66.7% 1,958 0.6%
DALLAS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 82606
11 61.1% 304 3.5%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
11 61.1% 1,174 0.9%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
11 61.1% 1,876 0.6%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
10 55.6% 785 1.3%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
10 55.6% 1,536 0.6%
TOM THUMB
Vendor ID 329748
9 50.0% 300 2.9%
VISTAPRINT
Vendor ID 345837
9 50.0% 741 1.2%
WALGREENS
Vendor ID 347856
9 50.0% 765 1.2%
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
9 50.0% 1,045 0.9%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
9 50.0% 1,077 0.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/07/2025Herbert, Zachary D. (Mr.)$31.67map of HD 112
07/01/2024Dallas County Democratic PAC - State & Local (CEC)$686.00Maps
09/12/2023Hernandez, Cassandra (Mrs.)$78.50Voter information
10/12/2022Neave Criado, Victoria (The Honorable)$33.95District Map
08/08/2022Jones Jr., Venton C. (Mr.)$121.00Map of HD100
04/18/2019Dallas County Republican Party (P)$235.05Committe Research Expense
10/17/2018Boos, Jonathan M. (Mr.)$113.20HD 113 Registered Voter List
10/05/2018Vote NO RISD TRE$221.37Registered voter data
07/09/2018Neave, Victoria (The Honorable)$109.39Voter Data
06/15/2018Williams, Staci (The Honorable)$107.58Voter Information Data
06/15/2018Williams, Staci (The Honorable)$62.00Voter Information Data
03/22/2018Williams, Staci (The Honorable)$220.00Voter Information Data
11/08/2017Mays, Lela D. (Ms.)$107.87Voter info
10/30/2017Mays, Lela D. (Ms.)$31.00Purchase of elections map
04/08/2016Dallas County Democratic PAC - State & Local (CEC)$156.59Senate District 9 Convention--Voter List CD (Reimburse Michael)
03/23/2016Anyiam, Chika A. (Mrs.)$31.83Data.
03/16/2016Alonzo, Roberto R. (The Honorable)$20.02Voter Lists
11/14/2014Alonzo Sr., Roberto R (Mr.)$471.39Voter Registration Information Request
11/25/2013Kids First$10.15District 8 voter data
10/21/2013Lord, Justin (Mr.)$149.33List of registered voters in Dallas County
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.