Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Cynthia Long Campaign
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 81259 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$89,296.58
Client Filers
28
Payments
101
Activity Range
03/02/2006–04/01/2024
Largest Payment
$2,500.00
Graph: 28 connected filers · 101 payments · $89,296.58 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Cynthia Long Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SYLVESTER TURNER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 302244
|
21 | 75.0% | 209 | 9.7% |
|
ANDY MEYERS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 16900
|
20 | 71.4% | 45 | 37.7% |
|
GRADY PRESTAGE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 132610
|
20 | 71.4% | 62 | 28.6% |
|
RODNEY ELLIS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 267559
|
20 | 71.4% | 187 | 10.3% |
|
MATT SEBESTA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 206223
|
18 | 64.3% | 43 | 34.0% |
|
WAYNE SMITH CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 349926
|
18 | 64.3% | 165 | 10.3% |
|
Valerie Covey Campaign
Vendor ID 341893
|
17 | 60.7% | 22 | 51.5% |
|
Tom Ramsey Campaign
Vendor ID 329690
|
17 | 60.7% | 51 | 27.4% |
|
ED EMMETT CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 98938
|
17 | 60.7% | 75 | 19.8% |
|
ADRIAN GARCIA CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 7258
|
17 | 60.7% | 96 | 15.9% |
|
R. JACK CAGLE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 253638
|
16 | 57.1% | 31 | 37.2% |
|
STACY ADAMS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 293777
|
16 | 57.1% | 34 | 34.8% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/01/2024 | HNTB Holdings Ltd. Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | To Support Primary 2026 - Williamson County Commission - Precinct 2 |
| 11/07/2023 | HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC | $2,500.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 11/07/2023 | Quiddity PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/25/2022 | Freese and Nichols PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Support |
| 09/19/2022 | HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC | $2,500.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 06/13/2022 | GarverUSA PAC | $2,500.00 | To Support General 2022 - Williamson County Commissioner - Precinct 2 |
| 05/31/2022 | Cobb Fendley PAC | $1,500.00 | Commissioner, Hays County, TX |
| 05/31/2022 | AIA Engineers PAC | $1,000.00 | ACEC Central Texas Event |
| 05/31/2022 | DEC PAC | $1,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 05/31/2022 | Pape-Dawson Engineers Political Action Committee | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 05/19/2022 | HNTB Holdings Ltd. Political Action Committee | $1,700.00 | Williamson County Commissioner - Precinct 2 |
| 12/28/2021 | HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC | $1,500.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 12/28/2021 | DEC PAC | $1,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 12/14/2021 | Pape-Dawson Engineers Political Action Committee | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 12/14/2021 | Raba-Kistner PAC, Inc. | $1,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 12/06/2021 | RPS Infrastructure, Inc. PAC | $1,000.00 | Political Contribution |
| 12/02/2021 | HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC | $1,500.00 | Direct Contribution |
| 12/01/2021 | Jones & Carter, Inc. PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/30/2021 | HNTB Holdings Ltd. Political Action Committee | $1,700.00 | To Support Primary 2022 - Williamson County Commissioner - Precinct 2 |
| 11/29/2021 | Political Action Committee of Pacheco Koch | $2,000.00 | Campaign contribution-Williamson County Commissioner, Pct. 2 |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.