Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

COMPlete Campaigns

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Consulting
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 72696 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$163,504.47
Client Filers
16
Payments
295
Activity Range
01/31/2006–10/26/2017
Largest Payment
$4,975.00
Graph: 16 connected filers · 295 payments · $163,504.47 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texans for Joe Straus$98,574.6011410/26/2017
2Hinojosa, Juan J$24,717.504210/22/2013
3Friends of Susan Combs Committee$7,600.001710/04/2010
4Price IV, Walter T.$7,350.002112/05/2012
5Shapleigh, Eliot$5,390.00612/31/2007
6Brady, Zachary S. (Mr.)$3,712.031006/30/2010
7Vo, Hubert$3,424.882812/01/2010
8Patrick, Dan (Mr.)$2,800.00807/07/2008
9Taylor, Nicholas V. (Mr.)$2,150.00711/12/2010
10Hubener, Katy (Ms.)$2,008.992011/01/2006
11Howard Jr., Robert (Mr.)$2,005.22810/23/2006
12Johnson, Eric L.$1,500.00401/29/2010
13Tarrant County Democratic Party PAC$950.00108/08/2012
14Gattis, Dan (Mr.)$750.00409/18/2008
15Denton County Republican Party$560.00311/21/2008
16Sexton, Janette (Ms.)$11.25210/19/2006

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
14 87.5% 3,017 0.5%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
13 81.3% 906 1.4%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
13 81.3% 1,077 1.2%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
13 81.3% 1,174 1.1%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
13 81.3% 1,327 1.0%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
13 81.3% 1,536 0.8%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
12 75.0% 1,360 0.9%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
12 75.0% 1,368 0.9%
MICHAEL'S
Vendor ID 212274
11 68.8% 349 3.1%
WAL-MART
Vendor ID 347528
11 68.8% 714 1.5%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
11 68.8% 1,101 1.0%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
11 68.8% 1,876 0.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/26/2017Texans for Joe Straus$12.50Credit Card Processing Fee
10/19/2017Texans for Joe Straus$2,105.00Credit Card Processing Fee
10/16/2017Texans for Joe Straus$137.50Credit Card Processing Fee
10/05/2017Texans for Joe Straus$492.50Credit Card Processing Fee
10/02/2017Texans for Joe Straus$690.00Credit Card Processing Fee
09/28/2017Texans for Joe Straus$375.00Credit Card Processing Fee
09/05/2017Texans for Joe Straus$2.50Credit Card Processing Fee
12/12/2016Texans for Joe Straus$250.00Credit Card Processing Fee
12/09/2016Texans for Joe Straus$425.00Credit Card Processing Fee
11/28/2016Texans for Joe Straus$500.00Credit Card Processing Fee
11/15/2016Texans for Joe Straus$300.00Credit Card Processing Fee
11/11/2016Texans for Joe Straus$1,575.00Credit Card Processing Fee
11/03/2016Texans for Joe Straus$756.25Credit Card Processing Fee
10/31/2016Texans for Joe Straus$231.25Credit Card Processing Fee
10/20/2016Texans for Joe Straus$950.00Credit Card Processing Fee
10/11/2016Texans for Joe Straus$175.00Credit Card Processing Fee
10/04/2016Texans for Joe Straus$1,225.00Credit Card Processing Fee
09/26/2016Texans for Joe Straus$217.50Credit Card Processing Fee
09/19/2016Texans for Joe Straus$1,637.50Credit Card Processing Fee
09/15/2016Texans for Joe Straus$950.00Credit Card Processing Fee
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.