Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

COMMUNITY IMPACT NEWSPAPER

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Media Advertising
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 72425 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$279,168.51
Client Filers
53
Payments
117
Activity Range
09/25/2008–04/19/2024
Largest Payment
$15,844.00
Graph: 53 connected filers · 117 payments · $279,168.51 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Friends of Ed Thompson$48,728.76710/30/2019
2Rostami, Matt (Mr.)$18,300.00202/02/2022
3McGill, Lorena Perez (Ms.)$15,467.56409/29/2020
4TownshipFuture$15,110.00710/02/2020
5Water Texas PAC$15,110.00210/09/2013
6Bays, Kristin (Ms.)$12,275.75312/20/2017
7McGuinness, Patrick J. (Mr.)$12,195.00310/20/2010
8Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$11,520.18409/30/2022
9Texas Pro Business Coalition$10,980.00210/15/2020
10Vote Yes GISD Bond$10,775.38510/18/2018
11Gordy Bunch for Texas$9,139.39104/09/2014
12Gonzales, Larry (Mr.)$7,640.00509/30/2010
13Engelhart, Mike (The Honorable)$6,048.75301/13/2022
14Schober Sr., Jonathan D. (Mr.)$5,866.22201/31/2022
15ChangeAustin.org$5,745.00310/24/2014
16King, Donna G. (The Honorable)$4,980.00309/30/2020
17Magnolia I.S.D. 2015 Bond$4,452.38309/24/2015
18Thompson, Andrea S. (The Honorable)$3,944.65208/19/2020
19Friends of Brandon Creighton$3,880.00507/21/2014
20Daniel, Robert (Mr.)$3,870.00310/13/2008

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
29 54.7% 3,017 1.0%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
25 47.2% 1,638 1.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
24 45.3% 1,958 1.2%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
21 39.6% 1,876 1.1%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
20 37.7% 1,174 1.7%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
20 37.7% 1,480 1.3%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
20 37.7% 1,536 1.3%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
19 35.8% 1,368 1.4%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
18 34.0% 1,360 1.3%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
17 32.1% 1,101 1.5%
PAYPAL
Vendor ID 240319
15 28.3% 947 1.5%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
15 28.3% 1,174 1.2%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
04/19/2024Yes For Georgetown ISD$1,775.00Ad in Apri.lssue
04/11/2024Yes For Georgetown ISD$500.00Ad in newspaper
10/04/2022Brown Daniel, Geneva (Rev.)$3,097.36 Advertising for October
09/30/2022Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$7,368.57advertising
09/30/2022Hochman, Daniel J.$1,535.00ADVERTISE
06/16/2022Wells Jr., Clinton E. (The Honorable)$2,040.00Digital ad
02/22/2022Blair, Maris A. (Mrs.)$150.00banner ad
02/16/2022Khan, Mike (Mr.)$50.00Newspaper Ads
02/15/2022Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$141.61Advertising
02/04/2022Zwiener, Erin A. (The Honorable)$1,910.00Advertising
02/03/2022Blair, Maris A. (Mrs.)$800.00newspaper sticker
02/02/2022Rostami, Matt (Mr.)$9,150.00ads
01/31/2022Schober Sr., Jonathan D. (Mr.)$5,681.11Newspaper Advertising
01/31/2022Schober Sr., Jonathan D. (Mr.)$185.11Newspaper Advertising
01/28/2022Khan, Mike (Mr.)$3,235.00Newspaper Ad
01/28/2022Khan, Mike (Mr.)$250.00Newspaper Ad
01/13/2022Engelhart, Mike (The Honorable)$2,029.25 Advertising in Community Impact Newspaper
01/13/2022Engelhart, Mike (The Honorable)$2,029.25Ad in Community Impact Newspaper
01/08/2022Rostami, Matt (Mr.)$9,150.00ads
11/17/2021Engelhart, Mike (The Honorable)$1,990.25Advertising in Community Impact Newspaper
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.