Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
CODY HARRIS CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 68586 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$918,558.08
Client Filers
103
Payments
306
Activity Range
12/22/2017–06/17/2026
Largest Payment
$50,000.00
Graph: 103 connected filers · 306 payments · $918,558.08 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Cody Harris Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
76 | 73.8% | 325 | 21.6% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
74 | 71.8% | 289 | 23.3% |
|
RYAN GUILLEN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 271542
|
73 | 70.9% | 253 | 25.8% |
|
DUSTIN BURROWS CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 96672
|
72 | 69.9% | 239 | 26.7% |
|
KEN KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 176470
|
71 | 68.9% | 195 | 31.3% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
69 | 67.0% | 325 | 19.2% |
|
BRYAN HUGHES CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 44066
|
68 | 66.0% | 230 | 25.7% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
67 | 65.0% | 295 | 20.2% |
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
66 | 64.1% | 268 | 21.6% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
66 | 64.1% | 524 | 11.8% |
|
TAN PARKER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 303857
|
65 | 63.1% | 273 | 20.9% |
|
DADE PHELAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 81860
|
64 | 62.1% | 219 | 24.8% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.