Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Clay County Leader

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 66724 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$15,553.25
Client Filers
15
Payments
69
Activity Range
08/14/2000–10/17/2024
Largest Payment
$2,092.86
Graph: 15 connected filers · 69 payments · $15,553.25 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Earp, Brandon (Mr.)$3,947.212806/08/2012
2Knowlton, William D. (Mr.)$2,881.80602/25/2020
3Frank, James B. (The Honorable)$2,310.66310/17/2024
4Coppage, Walter J. (Mr.)$1,950.66310/11/2024
5Williams, Marcella P. (The Honorable)$967.891002/22/2016
6Hall, Casey R. (The Honorable)$956.70406/12/2024
7Boggeman, Katie A. (Mrs.)$623.70102/06/2024
8Swenson Jr., John (Mr.)$496.00305/14/2012
9Hardcastle, Richard L. (The Honorable)$413.00501/24/2005
10Carter, Craig M. (Mr.)$406.00101/05/2018
11Walker Esq., Ronald G. (Mr.)$204.00102/07/2012
12Ray, William H. (Mr.)$165.38102/12/2016
13Wichita County Democrat Association$110.25108/30/2002
14McGaughey, Jack (Mr.)$60.00112/21/2007
15Richie, Betty (Mrs.)$60.00108/14/2000

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
9 60.0% 1,571 0.6%
Archer County News
Vendor ID 19470
8 53.3% 11 44.4%
NOCONA NEWS
Vendor ID 226659
8 53.3% 16 34.8%
Saint Jo Tribune
Vendor ID 272681
7 46.7% 12 35.0%
BOWIE NEWS
Vendor ID 39788
5 33.3% 15 20.0%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
5 33.3% 1,876 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
5 33.3% 3,017 0.2%
FOARD COUNTY NEWS
Vendor ID 115359
4 26.7% 7 22.2%
Montague County Shopper
Vendor ID 216940
4 26.7% 9 20.0%
Legend Bank
Vendor ID 189622
4 26.7% 10 19.0%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
4 26.7% 906 0.4%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
4 26.7% 1,360 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/17/2024Frank, James B. (The Honorable)$2,092.86campaign ad space running in various newspapers
10/11/2024Coppage, Walter J. (Mr.)$990.66Newspaper ad
08/20/2024Coppage, Walter J. (Mr.)$480.00Newspaper Advertising
06/12/2024Hall, Casey R. (The Honorable)$401.00Newspaper Ads
05/15/2024Hall, Casey R. (The Honorable)$248.80Newspaper Ads
04/04/2024Hall, Casey R. (The Honorable)$99.00Newspaper Ads
03/07/2024Hall, Casey R. (The Honorable)$207.90Newspaper ads
02/06/2024Boggeman, Katie A. (Mrs.)$623.70Newspaper advertising
01/30/2024Frank, James B. (The Honorable)$99.00town hall ad expense
11/22/2021Frank, James B. (The Honorable)$118.80Town Hall Advertisement
02/25/2020Knowlton, William D. (Mr.)$923.70Ads re election
02/23/2020Knowlton, William D. (Mr.)$52.80Ads re election
02/11/2020Knowlton, William D. (Mr.)$565.80Political Ad
02/03/2020Knowlton, William D. (Mr.)$565.80Political Ad
01/28/2020Knowlton, William D. (Mr.)$565.80Political Ad
01/28/2020Knowlton, William D. (Mr.)$207.90Political Ad
01/05/2018Carter, Craig M. (Mr.)$406.00Newspaper Ad
02/22/2016Williams, Marcella P. (The Honorable)$165.38newspaper advertising
02/16/2016Williams, Marcella P. (The Honorable)$165.38newspaper advertisement
02/12/2016Ray, William H. (Mr.)$165.38Newspaper advertisement
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.