Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

CHEROKEE PRINTING

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 59254 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$4,849.82
Client Filers
2
Payments
7
Activity Range
06/04/2004–10/02/2012
Largest Payment
$1,818.60
Graph: 2 connected filers · 7 payments · $4,849.82 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1GOODEN, LANCE$2,833.12310/02/2012
2Parnell, Joe (Mr.)$2,016.70409/20/2004

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Cedar Creek Pilot
Vendor ID 55597
2 100.0% 5 40.0%
FORNEY MESSENGER
Vendor ID 116008
2 100.0% 16 12.5%
KAUFMAN HERALD
Vendor ID 175151
2 100.0% 21 9.5%
TERRELL TRIBUNE
Vendor ID 307513
2 100.0% 24 8.3%
ANCHOR PRINTING
Vendor ID 16386
2 100.0% 25 8.0%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
2 100.0% 1,876 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/02/2012GOODEN, LANCE$105.22PRINTING EXPENSE
05/24/2012GOODEN, LANCE$1,818.60DIRECT MAIL EXPENSE
05/22/2012GOODEN, LANCE$909.30DIRECT MAIL EXPENSE
09/20/2004Parnell, Joe$896.31cards
09/13/2004Parnell, Joe$896.31cards
06/24/2004Parnell, Joe (Mr.)$173.20political cards
06/04/2004Parnell, Joe (Mr.)$50.88political cards
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.