Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Search/CENTRAL AUSTIN DEMOCRATS
Canonical Vendor

CENTRAL AUSTIN DEMOCRATS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 56378 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
View relationships →Reported names
Total Payments
$24,482.43
Client Filers
21
Payments
256
Activity Range
09/16/2002–06/07/2026
Largest Payment
$3,409.77
Graph: 21 connected filers · 256 payments · $24,482.43 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$19,956.3622806/07/2026
2Watson, Kirk P. (The Honorable)$1,000.00212/02/2021
3KPW PAC$1,000.00107/25/2024
4Cooper, Margaret A.$500.00110/27/2003
5Austin Travis County EMS Employee Association$500.00110/25/2012
6Volunteers Organized To promote Equity$500.00103/29/2023
7Jenkins, Scott$250.00110/30/2003
8Naishtat, Elliott$200.00111/06/2003
9Rodriguez, Eduardo R. (The Honorable)$120.00302/06/2010
10Livingston, Lora$100.00110/29/2003
11Doggett II, Lloyd$70.00109/16/2002
12Yelenosky, Stephen (Mr.)$50.00110/24/2003
13Capital Area Progressive Democrats$49.07101/06/2024
14Ellis, Maggie (Ms.)$40.00211/20/2023
15Hendricks, Jeremy (Mr.)$37.00201/20/2026
16Austin Firefighters PAC$25.00109/30/2002
17Jones, Aurora Martinez (Mrs.)$20.00207/07/2019
18Blazey, Dayna L. (Ms.)$20.00211/20/2019
19Thomas, Sherine E. (Ms.)$20.00211/17/2023
20Friends of Gonzalo Barrientos$15.00109/30/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
 19 90.5% 253 7.5%
CAPITAL AREA PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 50946
 15 71.4% 54 25.0%
South Austin Democrats
Vendor ID 288373
 14 66.7% 64 19.7%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
 14 66.7% 1,669 0.8%
LIBERAL AUSTIN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 190940
 11 52.4% 38 22.9%
BLACK AUSTIN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 35789
 11 52.4% 44 20.4%
CAPITAL AREA DEMOCRATIC WOMEN
Vendor ID 50933
 11 52.4% 51 18.0%
AUSTIN TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 24208
 11 52.4% 64 14.9%
CHECKMARK TYPESETTING
Vendor ID 58877
 11 52.4% 151 6.8%
WORLEY PRINTING
Vendor ID 357411
 11 52.4% 256 4.1%
UNIVERSITY DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 338964
 10 47.6% 65 13.2%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
 10 47.6% 3,017 0.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/24/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$19.20POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$28.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$19.20POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/15/2026ActBlue Texas$53.77POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/01/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/25/2026ActBlue Texas$273.67POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/20/2026Hendricks, Jeremy (Mr.)$12.00dues
01/18/2026ActBlue Texas$76.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/11/2026ActBlue Texas$62.41POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/04/2026ActBlue Texas$28.80POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
12/31/2025ActBlue Texas$67.22POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
12/21/2025ActBlue Texas$76.83POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
12/14/2025ActBlue Texas$86.42POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
12/07/2025ActBlue Texas$105.62POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
11/23/2025ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
11/09/2025ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
10/26/2025ActBlue Texas$76.83POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
10/22/2025Hendricks, Jeremy (Mr.)$25.00donation
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.