Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 51508 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$2,886.09
Client Filers
27
Payments
66
Activity Range
12/21/2001–10/09/2018
Largest Payment
$248.43
Graph: 27 connected filers · 66 payments · $2,886.09 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Travis County Democratic Party$594.311210/09/2018
2Watson, Kirk P.$504.45611/21/2011
3Connor, Geoffrey S.$350.00410/29/2003
4Texas Association of REALTORS Political Action Committee$171.05608/22/2005
5Bolton, Valinda (Ms.)$152.63210/22/2010
6Stick, Jack$119.07210/18/2004
7HARPER-BROWN, LINDA$119.07204/18/2013
8Republican Party of Texas$100.90402/24/2005
9Texas Republican Party (P)$94.60310/06/2017
10Sage, Karen (Mrs.)$92.55412/08/2009
11Barrientos, Gonzalo$84.00205/24/2002
12Brown, Clifford (Mr.)$71.99209/04/2009
13Eddie Rodriguez Campaign$58.46112/21/2001
14Lake Travis Republican Women$51.50106/20/2005
15De La Fuente, Efrain (Mr.)$45.47110/31/2011
16Austin Tejano Democrats$42.22101/23/2014
17Jones, J. Woodfin (Mr.)$39.78203/27/2008
18Jones, Jesse$32.48101/28/2005
19HARRIS, CHRIS$30.85103/13/2007
20Wong, Todd (Mr.)$27.60109/23/2009

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
24 88.9% 3,017 0.8%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
18 66.7% 906 2.0%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
18 66.7% 1,327 1.3%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
17 63.0% 1,536 1.1%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
16 59.3% 1,077 1.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
16 59.3% 1,958 0.8%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
15 55.6% 1,101 1.3%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
14 51.9% 1,368 1.0%
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
13 48.1% 253 4.9%
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
13 48.1% 355 3.5%
CAPITOL GIFT SHOP
Vendor ID 51371
13 48.1% 393 3.2%
AMAZON.COM
Vendor ID 13762
13 48.1% 553 2.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/09/2018Travis County Democratic Party$248.43Ink Stamps
09/26/2018Travis County Democratic Party$10.28Name Badge
08/02/2018Travis County Democratic Party$10.28Office Overhead/Rental Expense
07/18/2018Travis County Democratic Party$92.55Badges
10/06/2017Texas Republican Party (P)$34.21Party Office Supplies - Self Inking Signature Stamp
06/16/2017Travis County Democratic Party$7.71Name Badge
04/15/2017Travis County Democratic Party$14.25Office Overhead/Rental Expense
09/15/2016Travis County Democratic Party$30.85name badges
09/01/2016Travis County Democratic Party$7.71office supplies
08/18/2016Texas Republican Party (P)$21.05Party Office Supplies - Self Inking Stamp
11/20/2015Travis County Democratic Party$15.43Name Badge
09/24/2015Travis County Democratic Party$23.13Name badge
05/15/2015Green, Paul W. (The Honorable)$18.40Office Supplies
12/22/2014Texas Republican Party$39.34Party Office Supplies - Rubber Stamp
05/22/2014Soifer$30.85name Badges
01/23/2014Austin Tejano Democrats$42.22Purchased a plaque
12/18/2013Mexican American Legislative Caucus$18.40caucus stamp
09/12/2013Travis County Democratic Party$102.84Name tags
08/19/2013Campbell, Donna$10.83Constituent
08/07/2013Campbell, Donna$10.83Office Supplies
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.