Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
CANDIDATE RESOURCE COMMITTEE
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 50349 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$63,525.00
Client Filers
23
Payments
39
Activity Range
09/13/2006–06/29/2026
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 23 connected filers · 39 payments · $63,525.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Candidate Resource Committee
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
18 | 78.3% | 1,876 | 1.0% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
17 | 73.9% | 3,017 | 0.6% |
|
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
|
16 | 69.6% | 946 | 1.7% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
16 | 69.6% | 1,958 | 0.8% |
|
TEXAS FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 311375
|
15 | 65.2% | 584 | 2.5% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
15 | 65.2% | 1,480 | 1.0% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
15 | 65.2% | 1,571 | 0.9% |
|
TFRW
Vendor ID 315057
|
13 | 56.5% | 259 | 4.8% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
13 | 56.5% | 1,045 | 1.2% |
|
US POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 340337
|
12 | 52.2% | 696 | 1.7% |
|
PARTY CITY
Vendor ID 238598
|
12 | 52.2% | 734 | 1.6% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
12 | 52.2% | 1,327 | 0.9% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2026 | Salado Area Republican Women | $5,500.00 | campaign contribution |
| 06/12/2026 | Burnet County Republican Women PAC | $10,000.00 | Donation to Candidate Resource Committee for Republican candidates in November election |
| 12/04/2025 | Burnet County Republican Club PAC | $1,000.00 | provided for candidate primary access |
| 10/06/2025 | Burnet County Republican Women PAC | $1,000.00 | For Candidate Resource Committee to help with local candidates' elections |
| 09/05/2025 | Salado Area Republican Women | $500.00 | donation to campaign |
| 09/08/2024 | Brazosport Republican Women's PAC | $1,000.00 | Donation |
| 08/25/2024 | Brazosport Republican Women's PAC | $1,000.00 | Donation to CRC |
| 12/13/2022 | Republican Women of Trinity County | $50.00 | Candidate Resource Committee C/O Republican Party of Texas |
| 10/01/2020 | Arlington Republican Club PWR PAC | $500.00 | PAC donation |
| 09/12/2020 | Cherry Tree Republicans PAC | $1,000.00 | Contribution to Republican Party of Texas Candidate Resource Committee |
| 08/10/2020 | Golden Triangle Republican Women | $500.00 | Donation to CRC |
| 08/05/2020 | Brazosport Republican Women's PAC | $250.00 | Donation from S.R.E.C.District 17 |
| 10/10/2018 | Republican Women of North Texas | $250.00 | Contribution to CRC for all Republican Candidates |
| 09/17/2018 | Republican Women of Arlington | $500.00 | PAC contribution. |
| 09/11/2018 | Krause, Matthew H. (The Honorable) | $500.00 | Contribution |
| 09/04/2018 | Arlington Republican Club PWR PAC | $500.00 | PAC Contribution to CRC |
| 08/08/2018 | Nelson, Jane (The Honorable) | $10,000.00 | contribution |
| 07/18/2018 | Golden Triangle Republican Women | $500.00 | Support Republican Party |
| 06/04/2018 | Grimes County Republican Party (CEC) | $2,000.00 | Grimes County/SD5 Donations |
| 09/20/2016 | Arlington Republican Club PWR PAC | $500.00 | Campaign Contribution |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.