Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
CAMPAIGN SITE BUILDER
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 49550 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$618.40
Client Filers
4
Payments
5
Activity Range
08/21/2006–07/15/2010
Largest Payment
$197.50
Graph: 4 connected filers · 5 payments · $618.40 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Campaign Site Builder
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esparza, Michael (Mr.) | $198.90 | 2 | 08/24/2006 |
| 2 | BRAZORIA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY | $197.50 | 1 | 07/15/2010 |
| 3 | Democrats with Disabilities | $197.00 | 1 | 06/19/2010 |
| 4 | Phelan, Jay (Mr.) | $25.00 | 1 | 12/29/2007 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS
Vendor ID 360978
|
2 | 50.0% | 59 | 3.3% |
|
HUSTLE
Vendor ID 153883
|
2 | 50.0% | 92 | 2.1% |
|
CVS PHARMACY
Vendor ID 80917
|
2 | 50.0% | 358 | 0.6% |
|
WELLS FARGO
Vendor ID 350828
|
2 | 50.0% | 359 | 0.6% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
2 | 50.0% | 1,638 | 0.1% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
2 | 50.0% | 1,480 | 0.1% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
2 | 50.0% | 1,571 | 0.1% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
2 | 50.0% | 1,669 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2010 | BRAZORIA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY | $197.50 | WEBSITE |
| 06/19/2010 | Democrats with Disabilities | $197.00 | Web Site |
| 12/29/2007 | Phelan, Jay (Mr.) | $25.00 | campaign website |
| 08/24/2006 | Esparza, Michael (Mr.) | $149.00 | Website |
| 08/21/2006 | Esparza, Michael (Mr.) | $49.90 | Website |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.