Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Search/CALDWELL COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Canonical Vendor

CALDWELL COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 48154 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
View relationships →Reported names
Total Payments
$51,543.94
Client Filers
22
Payments
179
Activity Range
09/23/2000–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$9,649.27
Graph: 22 connected filers · 179 payments · $51,543.94 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$26,317.2714106/30/2026
2Democrats of Caldwell County Texas$11,488.67302/15/2023
3Caldwell County Tejano Democrats$2,500.00310/06/2014
4St. Leger, Andrea B. (Mrs.)$1,800.00211/16/2015
5Zaffirini, Judith$1,533.00209/11/2013
6Kimbrough, Charles R. (Mr.)$1,500.00112/07/2015
7Texas Democratic Women of Caldwell County$1,100.00509/09/2013
8Kelly, Chari L. (The Honorable)$1,100.00409/04/2023
9CTX Votes$1,000.00206/30/2024
10Doggett II, Lloyd$700.00102/20/2004
11Ryan, Dawn Michelle (Mrs.)$550.00108/15/2018
12Ellis, Maggie (Ms.)$450.00304/16/2024
13Weems, Christine (The Honorable)$250.00109/28/2024
14Smith, Edward S. (The Honorable)$250.00104/16/2024
15Venable, Desiree M.$250.00104/12/2024
16Byrne, Darlene (The Honorable)$150.00108/18/2023
17Howard, Donna S. (The Honorable)$150.00108/18/2023
18Triana, Gisela D. (The Honorable)$150.00108/27/2020
19Watson, Kirk P.$110.00109/24/2001
20Hathcock, J. Andrew$100.00110/11/2012

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
 18 81.8% 1,669 1.1%
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
 15 68.2% 253 5.8%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
 14 63.6% 1,480 0.9%
WORLEY PRINTING
Vendor ID 357411
 10 45.5% 256 3.7%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
 10 45.5% 1,638 0.6%
Hays County Democratic Party
Vendor ID 141509
 9 40.9% 51 14.1%
CAPITAL AREA PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 50946
 9 40.9% 54 13.4%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
 9 40.9% 1,958 0.5%
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
 8 36.4% 620 1.3%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
 8 36.4% 1,077 0.7%
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 338453
 8 36.4% 1,445 0.5%
AUSTIN YOUNG DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 24307
 7 31.8% 32 14.9%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/28/2026ActBlue Texas$105.65POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/21/2026ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/14/2026ActBlue Texas$33.61POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/31/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/24/2026ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/17/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/10/2026ActBlue Texas$19.20POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$33.61POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/19/2026ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/12/2026ActBlue Texas$33.61POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/31/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/22/2026ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/15/2026ActBlue Texas$33.61POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/08/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/01/2026ActBlue Texas$9.60POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/22/2026ActBlue Texas$48.02POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/15/2026ActBlue Texas$33.61POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.