Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

COPY CRAFT

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 74864 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$55,387.05
Client Filers
11
Payments
105
Activity Range
10/13/2000–01/01/2014
Largest Payment
$7,821.49
Graph: 11 connected filers · 105 payments · $55,387.05 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$34,006.892608/13/2012
2Craddick, Tom$6,940.385803/30/2009
3Bassett, Jennifer J (Mrs.)$4,407.47503/10/2010
4Barton, Amos (Mr.)$3,235.60302/11/2008
5Holder Jr., Floyd (Mr.)$1,640.56102/22/2002
6Massengale, Stephen (Mr.)$1,515.50501/01/2014
7Hilderbran, Harvey R. (Mr.)$1,509.00201/07/2005
8Friends Of Susan Combs Committee$1,289.27110/13/2000
9Lubbock Area Repulican Women PAC$428.68209/09/2013
10Miller, John (Mr.)$257.82109/28/2004
11Brown, Christopher D. (Mr.)$155.88110/31/2013

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
8 72.7% 1,571 0.5%
OFFICEMAX
Vendor ID 231066
5 45.5% 407 1.2%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
5 45.5% 1,327 0.4%
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
5 45.5% 1,368 0.4%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
5 45.5% 1,958 0.3%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
5 45.5% 1,876 0.3%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
5 45.5% 3,017 0.2%
LUBBOCK COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
Vendor ID 197080
4 36.4% 49 7.1%
ACTION PRINTING
Vendor ID 6486
4 36.4% 83 4.4%
AUSTIN CLUB
Vendor ID 23451
4 36.4% 166 2.3%
CITY OF AUSTIN
Vendor ID 65063
4 36.4% 355 1.1%
AMERICAN EXPRESS
Vendor ID 14540
4 36.4% 557 0.7%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
01/01/2014Massengale, Stephen (Mr.)$866.00Road Signs
01/01/2014Massengale, Stephen (Mr.)$212.17Push Cards
12/17/2013Massengale, Stephen (Mr.)$182.94Cards
12/17/2013Massengale, Stephen (Mr.)$79.39Cards
12/05/2013Massengale, Stephen (Mr.)$175.00Cards and envelopes
10/31/2013Brown, Christopher D. (Mr.)$155.88Notecards and Signs
09/09/2013Lubbock Area Repulican Women PAC$214.34printing of colored jacket for 2013-2014 yearboook
09/09/2013Lubbock Area Repulican Women PAC$214.34printing of colored jacket for 2013-2014 yearboook
08/13/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$6,912.04Printing cost of campaign mail materials
07/19/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$7,821.49Printing campaign mailers
07/05/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$977.50Campaign literature for runoff election
06/11/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$785.90Campaign postcards
05/25/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$741.51Campaign fundraising- donation postcards & reply envelopes
05/09/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$1,962.57campaign fundraising invitations
04/26/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$580.22Trifold brochures for fundriasing push
02/24/2012Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$201.85Cost of printing invitation postcards for campaign fundraising event.
11/22/2011Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$453.57Campaign flyers
11/02/2011Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$117.99Campaign advertising
10/31/2011Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$1,216.73Campaign flyers
10/07/2011Landtroop, James F. (Mr.)$188.36Campaign flyer
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.