Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
CN4 Partners
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 67992 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$259,865.90
Client Filers
8
Payments
21
Activity Range
06/01/2021–06/02/2026
Largest Payment
$61,775.00
Graph: 8 connected filers · 21 payments · $259,865.90 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- CN4 Partners
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goodwin, Vikki A. (The Honorable) | $177,125.00 | 6 | 02/21/2026 |
| 2 | Cole, Bobby A. (Mr.) | $40,924.50 | 4 | 11/21/2025 |
| 3 | Vo, Hubert (The Honorable) | $10,025.00 | 1 | 02/18/2026 |
| 4 | Carter, O. Kyler (The Honorable) | $10,000.00 | 1 | 02/28/2022 |
| 5 | Olson, Kimberly D. (Mrs.) | $8,899.50 | 2 | 07/20/2022 |
| 6 | Harmon, Mario B. (Mr.) | $5,165.00 | 4 | 06/28/2021 |
| 7 | Dunn, Zachary (Mr.) | $5,000.00 | 2 | 06/02/2026 |
| 8 | Bexar County Democratic Party (CEC) | $2,726.90 | 1 | 04/16/2024 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
7 | 87.5% | 1,669 | 0.4% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
6 | 75.0% | 3,017 | 0.2% |
|
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
|
5 | 62.5% | 592 | 0.8% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,077 | 0.5% |
|
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,638 | 0.3% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
5 | 62.5% | 1,958 | 0.3% |
|
ANNIE'S LIST
Vendor ID 18014
|
4 | 50.0% | 201 | 2.0% |
|
ZOOM
Vendor ID 360954
|
4 | 50.0% | 294 | 1.3% |
|
GODADDY
Vendor ID 130494
|
4 | 50.0% | 514 | 0.8% |
|
GOOGLE
Vendor ID 131689
|
4 | 50.0% | 620 | 0.6% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
4 | 50.0% | 906 | 0.4% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
4 | 50.0% | 1,101 | 0.4% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2026 | Dunn, Zachary (Mr.) | $2,500.00 | Consulting |
| 02/21/2026 | Goodwin, Vikki A. (The Honorable) | $10,025.00 | Digital advertising |
| 02/18/2026 | Goodwin, Vikki A. (The Honorable) | $10,525.00 | Digital advertising |
| 02/18/2026 | Vo, Hubert (The Honorable) | $10,025.00 | Event |
| 11/21/2025 | Cole, Bobby A. (Mr.) | $5,025.00 | retainer for media buys |
| 11/18/2025 | Cole, Bobby A. (Mr.) | $20,484.50 | media buys, including launch video, walk piece and banner |
| 11/07/2025 | Goodwin, Vikki A. (The Honorable) | $61,775.00 | Direct Mail consulting |
| 10/14/2025 | Goodwin, Vikki A. (The Honorable) | $28,025.00 | Digital advertising |
| 10/07/2025 | Goodwin, Vikki A. (The Honorable) | $61,750.00 | Digital advertising |
| 09/29/2025 | Goodwin, Vikki A. (The Honorable) | $5,025.00 | Digital Advertising |
| 08/11/2025 | Cole, Bobby A. (Mr.) | $415.00 | business cards |
| 07/25/2025 | Cole, Bobby A. (Mr.) | $15,000.00 | launch video |
| 04/16/2024 | Bexar County Democratic Party (CEC) | $2,726.90 | Design for Printing |
| 07/20/2022 | Olson, Kimberly D. (Mrs.) | $5,899.50 | Mailer |
| 07/16/2022 | Olson, Kimberly D. (Mrs.) | $3,000.00 | Digital Ads |
| 02/28/2022 | Carter, O. Kyler (The Honorable) | $10,000.00 | Campaign digital advertising |
| 06/28/2021 | Harmon, Mario B. (Mr.) | $2,000.00 | Consulting |
| 06/01/2021 | Harmon, Mario B. (Mr.) | $582.50 | Invoiced consulting expense |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.