Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

CITY OF SAN MARCOS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 65844 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$18,242.55
Client Filers
11
Payments
131
Activity Range
02/09/2002–11/24/2023
Largest Payment
$1,800.00
Graph: 11 connected filers · 131 payments · $18,242.55 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Patterson, Jerry E. (Mr.)$6,150.00910/26/2009
2Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$6,033.239406/25/2020
3Committee to Elect Patrick Rose$2,344.111001/22/2007
4Hays County Democratic Party Executive Committee$1,911.00611/08/2019
5Hays County Republican Party (P)$462.21310/28/2015
6Friends of Donna Campbell$375.00105/07/2013
7Hays County Republican Women$371.00211/24/2023
8Glickler, David S. (Mr.)$270.00212/12/2011
9Tony Sanchez for Governor Inc. (formerly Sanchez Exploratory Committee)$246.00202/09/2002
10Committee to Elect Jason Isaac$50.00110/02/2013
11Harry, Martin (Mr.)$30.00102/03/2004

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
9 81.8% 946 0.9%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
9 81.8% 1,174 0.8%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
9 81.8% 1,480 0.6%
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
9 81.8% 1,876 0.5%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
8 72.7% 1,327 0.6%
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
8 72.7% 1,536 0.5%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
8 72.7% 1,958 0.4%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
8 72.7% 3,017 0.3%
FEDEX OFFICE
Vendor ID 111594
7 63.6% 649 1.1%
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
7 63.6% 898 0.8%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
7 63.6% 1,101 0.6%
BUDA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 44784
6 54.5% 12 35.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/24/2023Hays County Republican Women$212.00Facility Rental for Jan 2024 Meeting
02/06/2023Hays County Republican Women$159.00Facility rental One Pill can Kill
06/25/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$23.12COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
06/25/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$13.75COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
05/27/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$20.10COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
05/27/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$13.53COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
04/28/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$31.10COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
04/28/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$13.99COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
03/26/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$32.35COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
03/26/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$17.31COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
02/26/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$23.14COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
02/26/2020Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$14.34COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
11/26/2019Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$42.79COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
11/26/2019Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$19.39COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
11/08/2019Hays County Democratic Party$26.00Rental of meeting space for CEC meeting
10/28/2019Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$47.74COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
10/28/2019Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$17.47COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
09/26/2019Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$36.49COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
09/26/2019Hays County Republican Party (CEC)$17.34COMMITTEE OFFICE UTILITIES
08/29/2019Hays County Democratic Party$151.00CEC meeting space deposit and rental
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.