Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
CHOCOLATE BAYOU CREDIT UNION
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 61428 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$1,026.25
Client Filers
2
Payments
3
Activity Range
11/15/2005–01/31/2014
Largest Payment
$1,019.25
Graph: 2 connected filers · 3 payments · $1,026.25 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- CHOCOLATE BAYOU CREDIT UNION
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRAZORIA SENATORIAL 11 | $1,019.25 | 1 | 11/15/2005 |
| 2 | West Pearland Republican Women | $7.00 | 2 | 01/31/2014 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WAL MART
Vendor ID 347396
|
2 | 100.0% | 264 | 0.8% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
2 | 100.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/31/2014 | West Pearland Republican Women | $5.00 | Draft Fee |
| 02/28/2010 | WEST PEARLAND REPUBLICAN WOMEN | $2.00 | CASHIER'S CHECK FOR CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/15/2005 | BRAZORIA SENATORIAL 11 | $1,019.25 | GARNISHMENT OF FUNDS DUE TO LEGAL ISSUES BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.