Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

CDM Media

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 55438 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$93,126.38
Client Filers
2
Payments
39
Activity Range
12/15/2016–06/30/2018
Largest Payment
$4,802.54
Graph: 2 connected filers · 39 payments · $93,126.38 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$48,324.841503/08/2018
2Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$44,801.542406/30/2018

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
Cricket
Vendor ID 78857
2 100.0% 46 4.3%
CHECKMARK TYPESETTING
Vendor ID 58877
2 100.0% 151 1.3%
INFOCUS CAMPAIGNS
Vendor ID 156789
2 100.0% 157 1.3%
KELLY GRAPHICS
Vendor ID 176177
2 100.0% 193 1.0%
TRAVIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 332469
2 100.0% 253 0.8%
FEDEX
Vendor ID 111488
2 100.0% 734 0.3%
AMAZON
Vendor ID 13608
2 100.0% 1,174 0.2%
FACEBOOK
Vendor ID 109240
2 100.0% 1,638 0.1%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
2 100.0% 1,480 0.1%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
2 100.0% 3,017 0.1%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
2 100.0% 1,669 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/30/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$3,500.00Campaign Management
06/12/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$3,500.00Campaign Management
05/01/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$700.00Office Rent
04/23/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$3,500.00Campaign Management
04/02/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$700.00Office Rent
03/09/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$3,500.00Campaign Management
03/08/2018Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$754.84Campaign Management
03/02/2018Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$3,900.00Campaign Management
02/20/2018Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$375.00Graphic Design
02/02/2018Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$3,900.00Campaign Management
01/30/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$3,500.00Campaign consulting
01/30/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$300.00Office Rent
01/04/2018Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$3,900.00Campaign Management
01/01/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$3,500.00Campaign consulting
01/01/2018Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$200.00Rent
12/04/2017Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$3,000.00Campaign consulting
12/04/2017Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$2,020.00Campaign consulting
12/01/2017Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$3,900.00Campaign Management
11/08/2017Vela III, Jose (Mr.)$4,802.54Campaign consulting
10/31/2017Hitt, Greg (Mr.)$3,900.00Campaign Management
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.