Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
CBC CREATIVE
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 55078 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$108,573.64
Client Filers
5
Payments
30
Activity Range
01/26/2016–03/10/2022
Largest Payment
$26,234.40
Graph: 5 connected filers · 30 payments · $108,573.64 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- CBC Creative
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $103,148.64 | 24 | 03/10/2022 |
| 2 | Butscher, Jason L. (Mr.) | $3,005.00 | 2 | 10/19/2017 |
| 3 | Back the Bond Sherman ISD | $1,200.00 | 2 | 08/17/2017 |
| 4 | Grayson County Conservatives | $920.00 | 1 | 02/17/2022 |
| 5 | Grayson County Republican Party (CEC) | $300.00 | 1 | 01/26/2016 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grayson County Republican Party
Vendor ID 133735
|
3 | 60.0% | 56 | 5.2% |
|
Women Rock INC.
Vendor ID 356495
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
TX CUSTOM CREATIONS
Vendor ID 335759
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
CITY OF SHERMAN
Vendor ID 65863
|
2 | 40.0% | 5 | 25.0% |
|
DENISON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Vendor ID 88399
|
2 | 40.0% | 5 | 25.0% |
|
Sherman Chamber of Commerce
Vendor ID 282989
|
2 | 40.0% | 11 | 14.3% |
|
GRAYSON COUNTY REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 133737
|
2 | 40.0% | 16 | 10.5% |
|
FIRST UNITED BANK
Vendor ID 113646
|
2 | 40.0% | 27 | 6.7% |
|
HERALD DEMOCRAT
Vendor ID 144012
|
2 | 40.0% | 28 | 6.5% |
|
Digital Corporate Companies
Vendor ID 90705
|
2 | 40.0% | 30 | 6.1% |
|
WINRED
Vendor ID 355799
|
2 | 40.0% | 169 | 1.2% |
|
BOOKER INDUSTRIES
Vendor ID 38936
|
2 | 40.0% | 186 | 1.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $1,350.00 | Graphic Design |
| 02/18/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $350.00 | Postcard - Campaign Literature |
| 02/17/2022 | Grayson County Conservatives | $920.00 | Newspaper |
| 02/16/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $9,985.00 | TV Media Placement |
| 02/16/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $5,654.00 | In-District Mailer |
| 02/16/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $1,250.00 | TV Media Placement |
| 02/15/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $8,985.00 | TV Media Placement |
| 02/10/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $790.00 | Print Media Placement |
| 02/10/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $125.00 | Graphic Design |
| 02/08/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $9,805.00 | Political Mail |
| 02/08/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $930.00 | Digital Ads |
| 02/01/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $4,000.00 | Print Media Placement |
| 02/01/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $900.00 | Yard Signs |
| 02/01/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $790.00 | Print Media Placement |
| 02/01/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $750.00 | Design |
| 02/01/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $600.00 | Print Media Placement |
| 02/01/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $280.00 | Push Cards |
| 01/31/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $11,280.00 | TV Media Placement |
| 01/31/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $5,333.00 | TV Media Placement |
| 01/31/2022 | Luther, Shelley A. (Ms.) | $4,939.00 | TV Media Placement |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.