Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

C&E Communications

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Consulting
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 46930 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$350,911.17
Client Filers
16
Payments
102
Activity Range
08/17/2000–12/21/2015
Largest Payment
$25,000.00
Graph: 16 connected filers · 102 payments · $350,911.17 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Raymond, Richard E. (Mr.)$90,643.733411/21/2014
2Zapata Notzon, Monica (Mrs.)$69,120.001304/26/2010
3Fisher, David J.$54,869.61611/02/2000
4Texans For Prop. 19$25,000.00211/02/2001
5Texas Medical Association Political Action Committee$23,143.291312/28/2009
6Marion, Sandee Bryan (Ms.)$14,847.39212/19/2014
7Mora Jr., Sergio C.$14,091.23412/27/2005
8Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$10,217.47606/29/2012
9Rios Ybarra, Tara (Dr.)$9,000.00612/21/2009
10Good Government PAC$9,000.00110/18/2006
11Shrum, Matthew W. (Mr.)$7,000.00112/21/2015
12Texas Academy of Family Physicians PAC$6,500.00202/06/2008
13Garcia III, Juan M. (Mr.)$6,000.00311/02/2006
14Zaffirini, Judith$5,487.13307/14/2009
15Thomas Jefferson Movement$3,202.28212/27/2010
16Texas Democratic Party$2,789.04408/14/2007

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
9 56.3% 3,017 0.3%
PIZZA HUT
Vendor ID 245404
8 50.0% 564 1.4%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
8 50.0% 906 0.9%
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
8 50.0% 1,360 0.6%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
8 50.0% 1,480 0.5%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
8 50.0% 1,669 0.5%
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Vendor ID 336943
7 43.8% 557 1.2%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
7 43.8% 1,101 0.6%
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
7 43.8% 1,174 0.6%
WEBB COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 350342
6 37.5% 31 14.6%
SPRINT
Vendor ID 291985
6 37.5% 234 2.5%
STRIPES
Vendor ID 298076
6 37.5% 315 1.8%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
12/21/2015Shrum, Matthew W. (Mr.)$7,000.00Campaign media consultant
12/19/2014Marion, Sandee Bryan (Ms.)$4,847.39Advertising
11/21/2014Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$1,500.00websitedevelopment
07/01/2014Marion, Sandee Bryan (Ms.)$10,000.00Communicaiton consulting
01/06/2014Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$5,000.00website development and media consulting
08/08/2013Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$1,500.00website development
01/07/2013Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$1,500.00Web site development
12/14/2012Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$1,818.99Video production for holiday ads
06/29/2012Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$1,000.00Campaign Consulting Fees
06/06/2012Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$2,500.00Campaign Consulting Fees
01/12/2012Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$3,000.00CONSULTING EXPENSE
12/12/2011Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$1,000.00Filming and production of holiday commercial
11/21/2011Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$2,217.47consulting expense $2,000 and travel expense $217.47
10/19/2011Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$1,000.00consulting expense
09/01/2011Ramirez Palomo, Rebecca (Mrs.)$500.00consulting expense
04/14/2011Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$3,500.00Video blog
03/24/2011Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$1,000.00Video blog
02/06/2011Raymond, Richard (Mr.)$1,500.00Video blog
12/27/2010Thomas Jefferson Movement$649.97website labor
10/08/2010Thomas Jefferson Movement$2,552.31website design and setup
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.