Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
BURNET COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 45853 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$11,063.33
Client Filers
5
Payments
181
Activity Range
06/06/2006–06/28/2026
Largest Payment
$508.05
Graph: 5 connected filers · 181 payments · $11,063.33 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Burnet County Democratic Party
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ActBlue Texas | $9,000.04 | 163 | 06/28/2026 |
| 2 | Burnet County Democratic Club | $1,719.05 | 7 | 12/30/2025 |
| 3 | Handley, Allan Dwain (Mr.) | $225.00 | 9 | 09/20/2024 |
| 4 | Highland Lakes Democratic Women | $74.34 | 1 | 06/06/2006 |
| 5 | Back to Basics PAC | $44.90 | 1 | 10/05/2010 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
5 | 100.0% | 1,669 | 0.3% |
|
ANNIE'S LIST
Vendor ID 18014
|
3 | 60.0% | 201 | 1.5% |
|
ACTBLUE
Vendor ID 6335
|
3 | 60.0% | 592 | 0.5% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
3 | 60.0% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
DWAIN HANDLEY 4 TEXAS
Vendor ID 96790
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
FRIENDS OF JESSICA TIEDT
Vendor ID 120906
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
REBECCA BELL-METEREAU FOR STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Vendor ID 257400
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
Victory Media Marketing
Vendor ID 344731
|
2 | 40.0% | 2 | 40.0% |
|
AUSTIN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 23522
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
CLAYTON TUCKER CAMPAIGN FUND
Vendor ID 66851
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
HALE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 138164
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
|
Highland Lakes Democratic Women
Vendor ID 145330
|
2 | 40.0% | 3 | 33.3% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/28/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $24.01 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/21/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $33.61 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/14/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $302.55 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/07/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $57.62 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/31/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $24.01 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/24/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $149.81 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/17/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $86.44 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/10/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $57.62 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 05/03/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $24.01 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/19/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $57.62 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/12/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $48.02 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/05/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $62.42 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/29/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $24.01 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $9.60 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/15/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $86.44 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/08/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $297.74 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/01/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $24.01 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/22/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $9.60 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/15/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $408.18 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/08/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $57.62 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.