Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
BORRIS MILES CAMPAIGN
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 39301 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$724,418.65
Client Filers
113
Payments
444
Activity Range
01/16/2006–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$19,210.00
Graph: 113 connected filers · 444 payments · $724,418.65 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Borris Miles Campaign
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SENFRONIA THOMPSON CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 280021
|
90 | 79.6% | 268 | 30.9% |
|
CAROL ALVARADO CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 52699
|
86 | 76.1% | 252 | 30.8% |
|
CHARLIE GEREN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 58258
|
81 | 71.7% | 325 | 22.7% |
|
TODD HUNTER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 329194
|
81 | 71.7% | 325 | 22.7% |
|
TEXANS FOR GREG ABBOTT
Vendor ID 308629
|
80 | 70.8% | 524 | 14.4% |
|
JOSE MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 169533
|
76 | 67.3% | 222 | 29.3% |
|
CHRIS TURNER CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 61899
|
76 | 67.3% | 265 | 25.2% |
|
DREW DARBY CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 95611
|
76 | 67.3% | 289 | 23.3% |
|
PHIL KING CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 243362
|
76 | 67.3% | 295 | 22.9% |
|
ARMANDO WALLE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 20137
|
74 | 65.5% | 173 | 34.9% |
|
GARNET COLEMAN CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 126154
|
73 | 64.6% | 192 | 31.5% |
|
JOHN WHITMIRE CAMPAIGN
Vendor ID 168462
|
73 | 64.6% | 235 | 26.5% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2026 | Oncor Texas State Political Action Committee of Oncor Electric Delivery Administration Corp. | $3,000.00 | Political contribution |
| 08/19/2026 | Texas Dental Association Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 07/07/2026 | Houston Pilots PAC | $1,500.00 | Contribution to committee |
| 06/30/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $288.15 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 06/28/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $168.08 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/19/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $48.02 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 04/12/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $4.80 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 03/30/2026 | Texas Sands PAC | $5,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 03/01/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $19.21 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 02/10/2026 | Texas Dental Association Political Action Committee | $1,500.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 02/01/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $19.21 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 01/28/2026 | ActBlue Texas | $2,401.25 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/30/2025 | ActBlue Texas | $43.22 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 11/24/2025 | Greenberg Traurig, P. A. PAC | $1,500.00 | Borris Miles, STATE SENATE TX-Political Contribution |
| 11/12/2025 | Texas Land Title Association PAC | $1,000.00 | Campaign Contribution |
| 11/10/2025 | Texas Assisted Living Association PAC | $2,000.00 | Campaign contribution |
| 11/02/2025 | ActBlue Texas | $6,901.16 | POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION |
| 10/29/2025 | Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee | $5,000.00 | Contribution-SD 13 |
| 10/28/2025 | Phillips 66 PAC | $1,500.66 | Primary |
| 10/24/2025 | CenterPoint Energy, Incorporated Political Action Committee | $2,500.00 | Contribution to State Committee |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.