Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Big Spring Printing

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 34235 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$18,469.84
Client Filers
2
Payments
7
Activity Range
10/18/2002–03/01/2006
Largest Payment
$5,639.53
Graph: 2 connected filers · 7 payments · $18,469.84 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Mouton, Drew (Mr.)$18,397.85603/01/2006
2Laney, James E$71.99110/18/2002

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
BROWNFIELD NEWS
Vendor ID 43549
2 100.0% 9 22.2%
Plainview Daily Herald
Vendor ID 245684
2 100.0% 16 12.5%
BIG SPRING HERALD
Vendor ID 34232
2 100.0% 17 11.8%
COX COMMUNICATIONS
Vendor ID 77669
2 100.0% 32 6.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
03/01/2006Mouton, Drew (Mr.)$4,590.88Printing literature
02/23/2006Mouton, Drew (Mr.)$5,390.85Printing literature
02/08/2006Mouton, Drew (Mr.)$5,639.53Printing literature
01/27/2006Mouton, Drew (Mr.)$925.53Printing literature
01/24/2006Mouton, Drew (Mr.)$925.53Printing literature
10/18/2002Laney, James E$71.99printing expense
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.