Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Bexar County Election

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 33315 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$934.60
Client Filers
3
Payments
5
Activity Range
10/08/2003–11/13/2021
Largest Payment
$750.00
Graph: 3 connected filers · 5 payments · $934.60 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Schwope, Aaron M. (Mr.)$750.00111/13/2021
2Mireles, Kenneth (Mr.)$150.00210/14/2003
3Taking Texas to the TOP$34.60210/28/2018

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
3 100.0% 3,017 0.1%
PRESTIGE PRINTING
Vendor ID 249363
2 66.7% 187 1.1%
VALERO
Vendor ID 341910
2 66.7% 361 0.6%
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
2 66.7% 1,101 0.2%
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
2 66.7% 898 0.2%
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
2 66.7% 1,480 0.1%
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
2 66.7% 1,958 0.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
11/13/2021Schwope, Aaron M. (Mr.)$750.00Candidate fee
10/28/2018Taking Texas to the TOP$17.60EV Roster
10/28/2018Taking Texas to the TOP$17.00EV Roster
10/14/2003Mireles, Kenneth (Mr.)$124.00Database
10/08/2003Mireles, Kenneth (Mr.)$26.00Database
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.