Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

BAY AREA NEW DEMOCRATS

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 29075 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$31,977.55
Client Filers
43
Payments
365
Activity Range
05/21/2001–06/07/2026
Largest Payment
$3,000.00
Graph: 43 connected filers · 365 payments · $31,977.55 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1ActBlue Texas$17,291.1827606/07/2026
2Harris County Democratic Party$3,530.18301/23/2011
3Jaworski, Joseph (Mr.)$2,048.00608/01/2008
4Bay Area Democratic Movement$1,714.19412/01/2022
5Noriega, Richard J (Mr.)$1,500.00312/10/2006
6PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 68 PAC FUND$1,000.00108/22/2008
7Murray, Mekisha (Mrs.)$530.00510/20/2008
8Neighborhood Democrats of Galveston County$500.00205/17/2004
9Stone, Kathleen (Ms.)$450.00209/08/2005
10Kirkland, Steven E. (The Honorable)$400.00208/16/2016
11Dollinger, Scot G. (Mr.)$350.00312/12/2019
12Carter, O. Kyler (The Honorable)$290.00307/16/2024
13Bay Area Association of Democratic Women$250.00109/18/2010
14Sexton, Janette (Ms.)$213.00710/03/2006
15Taylor, Leslie C. (Ms.)$150.00307/01/2008
16Fort Bend Democrats$150.00208/18/2004
17Poissant, Margaret A. (The Honorable)$150.00107/22/2024
18Perdue, Nicole V. (Ms.)$150.00107/17/2024
19Criss, Susan$130.00311/30/2009
20GAY, JOHN F.$125.00112/06/2013

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 140343
39 90.7% 492 7.9%
HARRIS COUNTY TEJANO DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 140583
30 69.8% 157 17.6%
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
27 62.8% 1,669 1.6%
HOUSTON BLACK AMERICAN DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 151365
25 58.1% 177 12.8%
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
25 58.1% 3,017 0.8%
AREA 5 DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 19567
20 46.5% 125 13.5%
KROGER
Vendor ID 181532
19 44.2% 785 2.3%
SOUTHWEST DEMOCRATS
Vendor ID 289825
18 41.9% 75 18.0%
ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN ATTORNEYS
Vendor ID 21666
18 41.9% 94 15.1%
HOUSTON BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 151295
18 41.9% 182 8.7%
Johnston Campaigns
Vendor ID 168946
17 39.5% 147 9.8%
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
17 39.5% 1,327 1.3%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
06/07/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/03/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/05/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/01/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/01/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/12/2026Abner Jr., Michael A. (Mr.)$25.00Membership Bay Area New Democrats
01/04/2026ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
12/07/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
11/02/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
10/05/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
09/07/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
08/03/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
07/06/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
06/01/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
05/04/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
04/06/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/30/2025ActBlue Texas$19.21POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
03/02/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
02/02/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
01/05/2025ActBlue Texas$24.01POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.