Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
AWALOO PRINTING
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 25164 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$23,246.77
Client Filers
7
Payments
26
Activity Range
09/17/2018–10/04/2024
Largest Payment
$5,263.50
Graph: 7 connected filers · 26 payments · $23,246.77 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Awaloo Printing
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $9,462.31 | 8 | 09/12/2024 |
| 2 | McManus, Jeffrey Robert (Mr.) | $4,450.00 | 1 | 12/20/2021 |
| 3 | Dahlberg, Julia E. (Mrs.) | $4,073.45 | 3 | 10/03/2022 |
| 4 | Austin, John B. (Mr.) | $2,414.50 | 2 | 06/22/2022 |
| 5 | Soto, Sylvia | $1,309.94 | 8 | 10/02/2024 |
| 6 | Arredondo, Johnny (Mr.) | $860.00 | 2 | 06/28/2022 |
| 7 | Jim Wells County Republican Party | $676.57 | 2 | 10/04/2024 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
5 | 71.4% | 1,480 | 0.3% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
4 | 57.1% | 1,876 | 0.2% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
3 | 42.9% | 1,536 | 0.2% |
|
Republican Party Bexar County
Vendor ID 261666
|
2 | 28.6% | 6 | 18.2% |
|
MONARCH TROPHY
Vendor ID 216664
|
2 | 28.6% | 94 | 2.0% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF BEXAR COUNTY
Vendor ID 261713
|
2 | 28.6% | 173 | 1.1% |
|
CORNER STORE
Vendor ID 75239
|
2 | 28.6% | 218 | 0.9% |
|
DOLLAR GENERAL
Vendor ID 92443
|
2 | 28.6% | 337 | 0.6% |
|
CIRCLE K
Vendor ID 63448
|
2 | 28.6% | 361 | 0.5% |
|
CHEVRON
Vendor ID 59468
|
2 | 28.6% | 596 | 0.3% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
2 | 28.6% | 1,571 | 0.1% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
2 | 28.6% | 1,958 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/04/2024 | Jim Wells County Republican Party | $81.19 | Signs |
| 10/02/2024 | Soto, Sylvia | $245.27 | signs |
| 09/24/2024 | Jim Wells County Republican Party | $595.38 | Printing expense for GOP signs |
| 09/12/2024 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $580.00 | hand card printing |
| 08/29/2024 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $5,263.50 | yard and street sign printing |
| 08/29/2024 | Soto, Sylvia | $143.43 | signs |
| 08/02/2024 | Soto, Sylvia | $120.00 | signs |
| 07/26/2024 | Soto, Sylvia | $198.75 | signs |
| 06/19/2024 | Soto, Sylvia | $129.90 | sign |
| 04/16/2024 | Soto, Sylvia | $97.42 | signs |
| 02/21/2024 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $836.23 | Yard signs |
| 02/01/2024 | Soto, Sylvia | $129.90 | sign |
| 10/28/2022 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $1,028.38 | cards and yard signs |
| 10/03/2022 | Dahlberg, Julia E. (Mrs.) | $569.40 | SIGNS |
| 09/21/2022 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $248.98 | hand card printing |
| 09/13/2022 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $38.43 | yard sign printing |
| 09/12/2022 | Dahlberg, Julia E. (Mrs.) | $1,056.52 | SIGNS |
| 09/10/2022 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $727.98 | street sign and card printing |
| 08/25/2022 | Dahlberg, Julia E. (Mrs.) | $2,447.53 | SIGNS |
| 08/23/2022 | McCray, Hubert Todd (Mr.) | $738.81 | yard sign printing |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.