Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
ATMOS ENERGY
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 22484 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$80,645.00
Client Filers
35
Payments
1,017
Activity Range
07/01/2004–06/30/2026
Largest Payment
$903.99
Graph: 35 connected filers · 1,017 payments · $80,645.00 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Atmos Energy
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
26 | 74.3% | 3,017 | 0.9% |
|
WALMART
Vendor ID 348446
|
24 | 68.6% | 1,876 | 1.3% |
|
SAM'S CLUB
Vendor ID 273581
|
23 | 65.7% | 1,360 | 1.7% |
|
TARGET
Vendor ID 304420
|
20 | 57.1% | 1,174 | 1.7% |
|
OFFICE MAX
Vendor ID 230798
|
19 | 54.3% | 1,327 | 1.4% |
|
HOME DEPOT
Vendor ID 148817
|
19 | 54.3% | 1,536 | 1.2% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
19 | 54.3% | 1,958 | 1.0% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
18 | 51.4% | 906 | 2.0% |
|
HOBBY LOBBY
Vendor ID 147424
|
18 | 51.4% | 946 | 1.9% |
|
BEST BUY
Vendor ID 32133
|
18 | 51.4% | 1,101 | 1.6% |
|
STAPLES
Vendor ID 294208
|
17 | 48.6% | 1,045 | 1.6% |
|
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
|
16 | 45.7% | 898 | 1.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.