Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

Angle & Associates

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Political Consulting
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 17424 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$2,776,625.98
Client Filers
6
Payments
195
Activity Range
09/23/2003–01/27/2011
Largest Payment
$55,000.00
Graph: 6 connected filers · 195 payments · $2,776,625.98 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Texas Democratic Trust$2,711,935.5617501/26/2011
2Raymond, Richard$25,000.00505/01/2005
3Lone Star Fund$17,343.36507/15/2010
4Davis, Wendy R.$15,000.00101/27/2011
5Texas Democratic Party$5,000.00105/05/2006
6Texas Democratic Party$2,347.06812/23/2003

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
NGP SOFTWARE
Vendor ID 225752
5 83.3% 30 16.1%
Jane Hedgepeth
Vendor ID 162024
5 83.3% 49 10.0%
OPINION ANALYSTS INC.
Vendor ID 233567
5 83.3% 89 5.6%
TEXAS WEEKLY
Vendor ID 314586
5 83.3% 89 5.6%
DELTA AIRLINES
Vendor ID 87682
5 83.3% 184 2.7%
ANNIE'S LIST
Vendor ID 18014
5 83.3% 201 2.5%
QUORUM REPORT
Vendor ID 253390
5 83.3% 197 2.5%
TIME WARNER CABLE
Vendor ID 328064
5 83.3% 390 1.3%
UNITED AIRLINES
Vendor ID 337997
5 83.3% 388 1.3%
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
5 83.3% 677 0.7%
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
5 83.3% 906 0.6%
COSTCO
Vendor ID 76204
5 83.3% 898 0.6%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
01/27/2011Davis, Wendy R.$15,000.00Political consulting services
01/26/2011Texas Democratic Trust$767.42Travel
01/12/2011Texas Democratic Trust$4,497.20Travel
12/15/2010Texas Democratic Trust$5,293.78Debriefing and Wrap Up
12/01/2010Texas Democratic Trust$5,210.27Travel
11/03/2010Texas Democratic Trust$7,859.93Travel
10/21/2010Texas Democratic Trust$30,000.00Consulting Services
10/21/2010Texas Democratic Trust$30,000.00Consulting Services
09/29/2010Texas Democratic Trust$30,000.00Consulting Services
09/29/2010Texas Democratic Trust$5,558.69Travel
09/01/2010Texas Democratic Trust$30,000.00Consulting Services
09/01/2010Texas Democratic Trust$5,088.14Travel
07/28/2010Texas Democratic Trust$55,000.00Consulting Services
07/28/2010Texas Democratic Trust$7,299.76Travel
07/15/2010Lone Star Fund$5,000.00Fundraising Consulting Services
06/30/2010Texas Democratic Trust$30,000.00Consulting Services
06/30/2010Texas Democratic Trust$10,172.82Travel
06/09/2010Texas Democratic Trust$25,000.00Consulting Services
05/26/2010Texas Democratic Trust$30,000.00Consulting Services
05/26/2010Texas Democratic Trust$8,163.52Travel
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.