Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Anedot Fees
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 16991 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$10,701.13
Client Filers
4
Payments
30
Activity Range
10/05/2015–06/06/2026
Largest Payment
$1,435.57
Graph: 4 connected filers · 30 payments · $10,701.13 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Anedot fees
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massengale for Texas Supreme Court | $8,423.37 | 24 | 06/12/2017 |
| 2 | Perez, John T. (Mr.) | $1,002.16 | 3 | 02/24/2024 |
| 3 | Judge Chris Wolfe Campaign | $709.20 | 2 | 10/24/2020 |
| 4 | Ivey III, Ben L. (The Honorable) | $566.40 | 1 | 06/06/2026 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANEDOT
Vendor ID 16982
|
3 | 75.0% | 642 | 0.5% |
|
USPS
Vendor ID 340732
|
3 | 75.0% | 1,958 | 0.2% |
|
THE GOBER GROUP
Vendor ID 319399
|
2 | 50.0% | 59 | 3.3% |
|
RIGHTSIDE COMPLIANCE
Vendor ID 264436
|
2 | 50.0% | 88 | 2.2% |
|
WELLS FARGO BANK
Vendor ID 350844
|
2 | 50.0% | 360 | 0.6% |
|
CONSTANT CONTACT
Vendor ID 73952
|
2 | 50.0% | 629 | 0.3% |
|
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
|
2 | 50.0% | 1,571 | 0.1% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.