Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
Altman Direct Marketing
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 12941 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$135,589.68
Client Filers
6
Payments
40
Activity Range
01/11/2000–11/16/2005
Largest Payment
$10,000.00
Graph: 6 connected filers · 40 payments · $135,589.68 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- Altman Direct Marketing
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leibowitz, David McQuade | $91,406.15 | 29 | 11/16/2005 |
| 2 | Committee For Responsible Leadership | $39,849.71 | 4 | 05/03/2003 |
| 3 | Marion, Sandee Bryan (Ms.) | $1,891.39 | 2 | 02/07/2002 |
| 4 | Hardberger, Phil (The Honorable) | $1,726.67 | 2 | 02/01/2000 |
| 5 | Northeast Bexar County Democrats PAC | $544.60 | 2 | 09/16/2004 |
| 6 | Stone, Catherine M. (The Honorable) | $171.16 | 1 | 10/20/2000 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BEXAR COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 33267
|
4 | 66.7% | 184 | 2.2% |
|
OFFICEMAX
Vendor ID 231066
|
4 | 66.7% | 407 | 1.0% |
|
OFFICE DEPOT
Vendor ID 230284
|
4 | 66.7% | 3,017 | 0.1% |
|
Crumrine Printers Inc.
Vendor ID 79709
|
3 | 50.0% | 5 | 37.5% |
|
BOB'S PRINTING
Vendor ID 38112
|
3 | 50.0% | 23 | 11.5% |
|
SAN ANTONIO BAR ASSOCIATION
Vendor ID 274302
|
3 | 50.0% | 68 | 4.2% |
|
ALLIED ADVERTISING
Vendor ID 11812
|
3 | 50.0% | 225 | 1.3% |
|
SPRINT
Vendor ID 291985
|
3 | 50.0% | 234 | 1.3% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
3 | 50.0% | 906 | 0.3% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
3 | 50.0% | 1,480 | 0.2% |
|
TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Vendor ID 310744
|
3 | 50.0% | 1,669 | 0.2% |
|
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
Vendor ID 311217
|
3 | 50.0% | 1,368 | 0.2% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $839.85 | Mail out |
| 11/02/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $5,000.00 | Mail out |
| 06/03/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $1,072.66 | Mail out |
| 06/03/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $1,072.66 | Mail out |
| 04/14/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $4,800.00 | Mail out |
| 04/14/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $4,800.00 | Mail out |
| 01/28/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $1,522.67 | Mail out |
| 01/28/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $1,522.67 | Mail out |
| 01/03/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $3,300.00 | Mail out |
| 01/03/2005 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $3,300.00 | Mail out |
| 11/12/2004 | Leibowitz, David M. (Mr.) | $8,367.58 | Advertising |
| 10/13/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $5,500.00 | Postage and Delivery |
| 10/05/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $5,000.00 | Postage and delivery |
| 09/29/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $3,000.00 | Postage and delivery |
| 09/24/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $6,900.00 | Postage and delivery |
| 09/16/2004 | Northeast Bexar County Democrats PAC | $272.30 | Mailing for promotion of political rally |
| 09/15/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $534.25 | Postage and delivery |
| 08/31/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $3,000.00 | Postage and delivery |
| 08/02/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $2,329.20 | Postage and delivery |
| 07/22/2004 | Leibowitz, David (Mr.) | $2,320.28 | Postage and delivery |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.