Texas Ethics Commission data Release v1.4 Source snapshot September 17, 2026 Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor

All Sorts Mailing

Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 11270 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$76,187.59
Client Filers
4
Payments
11
Activity Range
01/12/2018–10/10/2024
Largest Payment
$16,567.86
Graph: 4 connected filers · 11 payments · $76,187.59 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.

Reported Names

Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.

Top Client Filers

Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
#FilerPaidPaymentsLast Payment
1Abel, James C. (Mr.)$73,778.23602/29/2024
2Lamb, Sarah C. (Ms.)$1,050.60210/20/2022
3Howell, Jayne Phillips (Mrs.)$1,044.61101/12/2018
4Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (The Honorable)$314.15210/10/2024

Shared Client Network

Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count. This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
Vendor Shared Clients Focal Coverage Peer Clients Network Overlap
ROBSON RANCH REPUBLICAN CLUB
Vendor ID 266796
3 75.0% 26 11.1%
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS
Vendor ID 261858
3 75.0% 1,571 0.2%
Denton Depot
Vendor ID 88819
2 50.0% 7 22.2%
CROSS TIMBERS GAZETTE
Vendor ID 79298
2 50.0% 9 18.2%
DENTON COUNTY CONSERVATIVE COALITION
Vendor ID 88708
2 50.0% 14 12.5%
Miller Media Holdings
Vendor ID 214488
2 50.0% 15 11.8%
Campaign Direct
Vendor ID 49069
2 50.0% 22 8.3%
Texas Strong Republican Women
Vendor ID 314071
2 50.0% 22 8.3%
DENTON COUNTY GOP
Vendor ID 88736
2 50.0% 32 5.9%
PARK CITIES REPUBLICAN WOMEN
Vendor ID 237932
2 50.0% 52 3.7%
HOUSTON SIGN COMPANY
Vendor ID 152225
2 50.0% 60 3.2%
ALBERTSONS
Vendor ID 10061
2 50.0% 181 1.1%
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count. Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.

Recent Reported Payments

DateClient FilerAmountDescription
10/10/2024Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (The Honorable)$200.85Campaign push cards
10/04/2024Parker IV, Nathaniel W. (The Honorable)$113.30Campaign push cards
02/29/2024Abel, James C. (Mr.)$15,937.84Mailers
02/28/2024Abel, James C. (Mr.)$15,937.84Mailers
02/28/2024Abel, James C. (Mr.)$1,138.28Mailers
02/27/2024Abel, James C. (Mr.)$15,937.84Mailers
02/22/2024Abel, James C. (Mr.)$8,258.57Mailers
02/15/2024Abel, James C. (Mr.)$16,567.86Mailers
10/20/2022Lamb, Sarah C. (Ms.)$525.30Advertising
10/17/2022Lamb, Sarah C. (Ms.)$525.30Advertising
01/12/2018Howell, Jayne Phillips (Mrs.)$1,044.61Push Cards
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.