Texas Ethics Commission data
Release v1.4
Source snapshot September 17, 2026
Latest eligible reported transaction September 15, 2026
Canonical Vendor
AT&T Center
Resolved vendor identity assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission payee records.
Canonical vendor · Vendor ID 21930 · Resolution: Indexed Canonical Identity
Total Payments
$2,427.27
Client Filers
7
Payments
20
Activity Range
03/21/2008–10/10/2017
Largest Payment
$373.00
Graph: 7 connected filers · 20 payments · $2,427.27 represented
Canonical vendor assembled from reviewed Texas Ethics Commission reported payee identities. Source records remain unchanged.
Reported Names
Payee names preserved from the reported/curated source layer and resolved to this canonical vendor.
- AT&T Center
Top Client Filers
Canonical client relationships from vendor_clients_canonical.
| # | Filer | Paid | Payments | Last Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $1,116.05 | 8 | 06/04/2012 |
| 2 | Miller, Douglas R. (The Honorable) | $908.48 | 5 | 02/14/2016 |
| 3 | Patrick, Dan (The Honorable) | $281.24 | 1 | 09/24/2016 |
| 4 | Rodriguez, Eduardo R. (The Honorable) | $81.50 | 3 | 10/10/2017 |
| 5 | Raymond, Richard (Mr.) | $15.00 | 1 | 01/07/2012 |
| 6 | Workman, Paul (Mr.) | $15.00 | 1 | 10/30/2012 |
| 7 | Martinez, Rebeca (Mrs.) | $10.00 | 1 | 03/12/2012 |
Shared Client Network
Other canonical vendors paid by the same filer clients. Ranked by shared-client count.
This is a structural overlap measure, not evidence of affiliation or coordination.
| Vendor | Shared Clients | Focal Coverage | Peer Clients | Network Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHEVRON
Vendor ID 59468
|
6 | 85.7% | 596 | 1.0% |
|
AT&T
Vendor ID 21858
|
6 | 85.7% | 906 | 0.7% |
|
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
Vendor ID 289694
|
6 | 85.7% | 1,077 | 0.6% |
|
HEB
Vendor ID 142370
|
6 | 85.7% | 1,480 | 0.4% |
|
EDDIE V'S
Vendor ID 99337
|
5 | 71.4% | 120 | 4.1% |
|
LUBY'S
Vendor ID 197228
|
5 | 71.4% | 189 | 2.6% |
|
HYATT REGENCY
Vendor ID 154347
|
5 | 71.4% | 249 | 2.0% |
|
OMNI HOTEL
Vendor ID 232416
|
5 | 71.4% | 326 | 1.5% |
|
MICHAEL'S
Vendor ID 212274
|
5 | 71.4% | 349 | 1.4% |
|
CAPITOL GIFT SHOP
Vendor ID 51371
|
5 | 71.4% | 393 | 1.3% |
|
SHELL
Vendor ID 281652
|
5 | 71.4% | 614 | 0.8% |
|
AMERICAN AIRLINES
Vendor ID 14178
|
5 | 71.4% | 677 | 0.7% |
Method: Focal Coverage = shared clients ÷ this vendor's client count.
Network Overlap = Jaccard similarity: shared clients ÷ union of both client sets.
Recent Reported Payments
| Date | Client Filer | Amount | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2017 | Rodriguez, Eduardo R. (The Honorable) | $17.75 | food/drink at member event |
| 09/24/2016 | Patrick, Dan (The Honorable) | $281.24 | Officeholder Lodging To Attend Campaign Meetings |
| 02/14/2016 | Miller, Douglas R. (The Honorable) | $308.16 | dining with constituents |
| 06/15/2014 | Miller, Douglas (Mr.) | $373.00 | constituent gifts |
| 06/10/2014 | Miller, Douglas (Mr.) | $20.00 | parking fee |
| 02/22/2014 | Miller, Douglas (Mr.) | $156.68 | dining with constituents |
| 02/10/2014 | Miller, Douglas (Mr.) | $50.64 | event expense |
| 10/30/2012 | Workman, Paul (Mr.) | $15.00 | Office holder -Parking Fees |
| 06/04/2012 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $122.58 | Dinner Meeting |
| 03/12/2012 | Martinez, Rebeca (Mrs.) | $10.00 | campaign event parking |
| 01/07/2012 | Raymond, Richard (Mr.) | $15.00 | Parking to meet with Councilmembers |
| 03/21/2011 | Rodriguez, Eduardo (Mr.) | $46.00 | concessions at AT&T Center Event with constituent |
| 12/18/2010 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $151.00 | Dinner |
| 04/02/2010 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $150.74 | Dinner Meeting |
| 04/02/2010 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $125.74 | Dinner Meeting |
| 03/10/2010 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $157.74 | Dinner Meeting |
| 11/14/2008 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $155.41 | Dinner |
| 03/21/2008 | Hinojosa, Juan J | $126.42 | Dinner W/ Official |
| 03/21/2008 | Hinojosa, Juan | $126.42 | Dinner W/ Official |
Evidence basis: A canonical vendor identity was resolved using the curated vendor layer. Raw reported-payee statistics remain separate from canonical vendor statistics so the source record and analytical identity are distinguishable.